Last spring, seed corn maggots (SCM) caused problems for growers in early plantings of melons and cotton. In some instances, significant stand reductions due to larvae feeding on germinating seed required a few fields to be replanted. Not only is this an inconvenience to the grower, but replanting is expensive and can disrupt harvest schedules. Unfortunately, once maggots have been found infesting the soil during stand establishment, there is usually nothing you can do. Thus, avoidance of the problem is the most effective way of preventing stand reductions (read more on SCM management). First, weather plays a major role in determining the damage potential for SCM to be a problem. Melon stands are more susceptible to SCM during wet, cold spring weather in which seed germination is slowed or delayed. These conditions give SCM a chance to develop in the soil and attack the seeds before they can emerge. Another important factor is SCM are attracted to fields with high levels of decomposing organic matter. This includes heavy plant residue remaining after harvest of the previous lettuce or cole crop, and applications of manure prior to planting. Growers would be encouraged not to plant melons into fields under these conditions. However if growers decide to plant in these conditions, then it would be wise to use a preventative insecticide applied at planting to minimize the impact from SCM and give seedling stands a fighting chance. A few alternatives are available that have shown activity against SCM and may be practical for SCM management in spring melons. Please see the publication Seed Corn Maggot Control With In-Furrow Sprays and Seed Treatments On Cantaloupes and Insecticide Alternatives for Preventative Seed Corn Maggot Control in Spring Melons.

In arid and semi-arid regions, water is our first limiting factor in a crop production system, followed closely by bio-available nitrogen (N).  Thus, our management of water and N are critically important to produce a healthy crop with good yields and quality.
 
Water and nutrient demands coincide with the fruiting cycle and efficient management of irrigation water and plant nutrients is enhanced by tracking crop development in the field.  The use of heat units (HUs) with 86/55 ^oF upper and lower thresholds can be applied to warm season crops in the desert Southwest in relation to the thermal environmental impacts on the development of all crop systems (Brown, 1989), including chiles, (Figures 1 and 2).
 
Crop Phenology Relationship to Water and Nitrogen Demand
 
Phenological guidelines have been developed for many crops, including New Mexico type chiles (Soto-Ortiz and Silvertooth, 2007 and Silvertooth, et al, 2010; Figure 1).  This phenological guideline can be used to identify or predict important stages of crop development that impact physiological requirements.  For example, a phenological guideline can help identify stages of growth in relation to crop water use (consumptive use) and nutrient uptake patterns (Figure 3).
 
This information allows growers to improve the timing of water and N inputs to improve production efficiency.  For some crops or production situations HU based phenological guidelines can be used to project critical dates such as harvest or crop termination.  Many other applications related to crop management (e.g., pest management) can be derived from a better understanding of crop growth and development patterns.

Figure 1.  Typical relationship between the rate of plant growth and development
and temperature.  Growth and development ceases when temperatures decline
below the lower temperature threshold (A) or increase above the upper
temperature threshold (C).  Growth and development increases rapidly when
temperatures fall between the lower and upper temperature thresholds (B).


Figure 2.  Basic phenological guideline for irrigated New Mexico-type chiles.

References
Brown, P. W.  1989.  Heat units.  Bull. 8915, Univ. of Arizona Cooperative Extension, College of Ag., Tucson, AZ.
Silvertooth, J.C., P.W. Brown, and S. Walker.  2010. Crop Growth and Development for Irrigated Chile (Capsicum annuum).  University of Arizona Cooperative Extension Bulletin No. AZ 1529
Soto-Ortiz, R. and J.C. Silvertooth.  2007. A Crop Phenology Model for Irrigated New Mexico Chile (Capsicum annuum L.) The 2007 Vegetable Report. Jan 08:104-122. 

 

Downy mildew has always been one of the major problem for PCAs and growers in the desert southwest. The symptoms observed are green to yellow angular spots on the upper surface of the leaves and fluffy growth on the lower side (See Picture). Symptoms usually start from older leaves. As disease progresses the lesion turn brown and dry up and in some occasions the disease can become systemic causing dark discoloration of vascular tissue.

Favorable condition for disease development:
The pathogen Bremia lactucae thrives in damp, cool condition, with moisture present on leaves. Spores are short-lived but dispersed efficiently by wind during moist period. Cultivated lettuce is the main host of the pathogen but it has also been reported to infect artichoke, cornflower and strawflower.

Why is downy mildew difficult to manage?
One of the main reason that hinders the disease management is the complexity of the pathogen. Bremia lactucae consists of multiple races (pathotypes), and new races continue to occur as pathogen evolves. The pathogen is one of the fastest evolving plant pathogen. And each pathotypes have developed insensitivity to fungicides to different extent.

One of the best practice is to grow resistant cultivar, but there are limitations. As the pathogen is highly variable and dynamic, resistant cultivars are not a permanent solution as the pathogen overcomes the resistance by evolving into virulent strains and isolates.

Preventative application of fungicides are effective to some extent. Reducing leaf wetness and humidity by using drip or furrow irrigation can be helpful. However, weather condition like rain during cool weather as we had in past couple of weeks is conducive to development of epidemics and we have very little control on that matter.

At the UC Cooperative Extension 2024 Automated Technology Field Day in Salinas, CA a couple of weeks ago, 12 of the latest automated and robotic technologies were demonstrated in the field. Most were designed for weed control or thinning vegetable crops. Several of the technologies shown are relatively “new” for the 2024 season. These included laser weeders that also are capable of thinning lettuce (Fig. 1 & 2), a smart cultivator/side-dresser that cultivates between individual crop plants and simultaneously applies fertilizer at a variable rate depending on plant size (Fig. 3), a spot sprayer that utilizes superheated vegetable oil to kill weeds (Fig. 4), and a self-propelled machine that disinfests soil prior to planting using steam. Although the test runs were short, I was impressed with the possibilities for these machines. Company representatives said they will be in Arizona this upcoming season and are interested in meeting with growers. Company contact information can be found at their respective websites, or feel free to contact me if you would like additional information.

Fig. 1. Carbon Robotics’¹ (Seattle, WA) LaserWeeder^TM. The unit utilizes a vision
system to detect crop plants and weeds. A laser is used to kill unwanted plants.
The machine can be used for weeding or thinning lettuce crops (bottom).


Fig. 2. L&A¹ (Chico, WA) autonomous laser weeding/thinning robot. The unit is
equipped with a vision system to detect crop plants and weeds, and a laser to kill
unwanted plants. The machine can be used for crop thinning or weeding (weeded
carrot crop, bottom).


Fig. 3. Stout Industrial Technology’s¹ (Salinas, CA) smart cultivator/side
dresser. The unit is equipped with a vision system for detecting crop plants, and
blades that move in and out of the crop row to remove in-row weeds. Liquid
fertilizer (shown colored with blue dye) is applied at a variable rate depending on
plant size.


Fig. 4. Tensorfield Agriculture¹ (Union City, CA) precision spot spray weeding
machine. The unit has an 80” wide spray boom equipped with 232 individually
controllable spray nozzles to spot spray weeds with superheated vegetable oil
(bottom left, bottom right). A vision system is used to detect weeds and spot
spray resolution is ¼”.


Fig. 5. UA/UC Davis self-propelled band-steam applicator. Device injects steam
into the soil to kill weed seed and soilborne pathogens prior to planting.

[1] Reference to a product or company is for specific information only and does not endorse or recommend that product or company to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.

Why is it that the summer months we spray herbicides, and they don’t work for some weed species. 

For example, during the hot time of the day and when desert weeds are stressed for moisture even the highest rate of Glyphosate sometimes is not effective.
Some desert weeds develop physical characteristics and growth habits that equip them to survive hot and dry conditions. We have seen that some species have different response to herbicides in cool areas than our low desert. 

Weeds in the desert have a thicker skin to preserve water. The stomates, which are the pores found in the epidermis of leaves, stems, and other organs, controlling the rate of gas exchange between the internal air spaces of the leaf and the atmosphere are closed¹. Plant transpiration is reduced, and this interferes with the translocation of herbicides in the weeds.

Take as an example Purslane, which has very succulent leaves and stems and can survive incredibly high hot and dry conditions. Then when weather is more favorable it comes out of survival mode to start growth again at the presence of moisture.

Other perennial species have underground structures that help them survive such as Nutsedge and bermudagrass have tubers, and rhizomes.
Lundkvist² stated:” The conclusion is that environmental conditions that promote growth rate of the weed stand will also increase the herbicide effect. The results were based on data from two field experimental series performed at six sites in southern Sweden during 1991–1994”.



 References:
1. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stomata
2. A. Lundkvist,
Predicting optimal application time for herbicides from estimated growth rate of weeds,
Agricultural Systems,
Volume 54, Issue 2, 1997,

Area wide Insect Trapping Network   VegIPM Update, Vol. 15, No. 4, Mar 1, 2024
 
Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.
 
Corn earworm:           
CEW moth counts remain  low levels  in areas, below average for this time of year.
 
Beet armyworm:          
Trap counts low; increased areawide; lower than average compared to previous years.
 
Cabbage looper:          
Cabbage looper counts increased in most traps and below average for this time of season.
 
Diamondback moth:      
DBM moth counts increased significantly in  Gila and Yuma Valley. About average for this time of the year.
 
Whitefly:                     
Adult movement negligible, average for late winter. 
 
Thrips:                          
Thrips adult counts increased in most areas, below average compared with previous years.
 
Aphids:                         
Aphid movement increased in many in the Yuma and Gila Valleys; above average for early March.
 
Leafminers:                   
Adults remain low in most locations, average for late- February.