Neonicotinoid insecticides have played a very important role in aphid and whitefly management in desert produce and melons since Admire 2F was first registered as a Sec. 18 in 1993. Since that time, several additional neonicotinoid active ingredients have been registered, and collectively the soil and foliar use of these compounds have become key components in our desert IPM programs.      Most of you are likely aware that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been reevaluating the four neonicotinoid insecticides, clothianidin, dinotefuran, imidacloprid, and thiamethoxam, under the registration review program as mandated by FIFRA and FQPA of 1996 to implement risk mitigation.   The agency recently released their Proposed Interim Registration Review Decisions (PID) for these four active ingredients (Feb 2, 2020) so that it can implement interim risk mitigation.  Their risk mitigations were focused primarily on reducing risks to pollinators and aquatic invertebrates and have resulted in several important proposed changes to how the four neonicotinoids can be used in the future.

Most of the proposed changes were minor for leafy vegetables and brassica/Cole crops, however additional restrictions have been proposed for melon crops.  I have prepared a summary of the proposed changes for clothianidin, dinotefuran, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam and the impacts these changes may have on desert leafy vegetable and melons in the following document: Impact of Proposed EPA Label Changes on Neonicotinoid Uses on Produce and Melon Crops in the Desert Southwest. The bottom line:  based on my review of the PIDs for each neonicotinoid, I’ve concluded that the proposed changes to neonicotinoid labels should have minimal impact on production of leafy vegetable and melon crops in the desert southwest. However, melon growers may have to absorb additional expenses in managing whiteflies on spring melons. The impact of requiring applicators to use larger droplet sizes when applying neonicotinoids to mitigate drift and runoff is unknown.   

For an overview of the mitigations proposed for all crops, the IR-4 program provided the following summary of mitigation for each neonicotinoid and links to EPA websites where you can find the PIDs and associated information – PID Mitigation Summary for Neonicotinoids.   If you have any issues with EPAs proposed changes, I strongly encourage you to submit a letter with your concerns to the EPA through their Open Docket for Comment and Review process which closes on May 4, 2020 unless extended.  If you need additional information or want to discuss this information further, please contact me.

Stay Safe!

As part of the Southwest Ag Summit (SWAS) that took place in Yuma in late February, we conducted a breakout session on Thursday, 22 February 2024 titled “Colorado River Water Shortage: Agricultural Perspectives”.  
This session provided a brief review of the background, the current situation on the Colorado River, and very importantly it included an outlook on the current discussions among the basin states to negotiate a new compromise for the guidelines of use under conditions of water shortage.  These new guidelines will go into place at the end of 2026.  Both the upper and lower basin states have now submitted draft proposals to the Bureau of Reclamation (BoR) on 6 March 2024.
This breakout session at the Southwest Ag Summit provided up to date information and first-hand insight into the process.  The participants were each uniquely qualified to offer valuable perspectives on these issues.  
The participants included Elston Grubaugh, Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District, who introduced the discussion and served as program moderator.  Bart Fisher, Palo Verder Irrigation District and State of California Colorado River Water Board member, Fisher Ranch, Blythe CA, provided a California perspective with a background of extensive experience in Colorado River management over several decades.  Hank Auza, Yuma County Water User’s Association President and Yuma Ag Water Coalition representative, Barkley Co. of Arizona, Yuma AZ, provided an Arizona perspective.  
Elston has extensive experience working in irrigation districts on both the California and Arizona sides of the Colorado River.  He has a valuable perspective, and he plays an important role in the management of Colorado River water in the Yuma area.  We are fortunate to have Elston provide his direction for this program and offer his point of view.
Both Bart and Hank are directly involved in the ongoing reconsultation negotiations directed at developing the new Colorado River management guidelines that will go into place in 2026.  Both are part of their state's delegation in the current negotiations and represent the lower basin.  Bart and Hank are not only responsible for representing California and Arizona, but they are both active farmers in the Palo Verde Valley and Yuma area valleys, and they bring valuable perspectives to the discussions.
The goal of negotiations among the seven U.S. Colorado River basin states has been to submit a single document proposing guidelines to the BoR.  However, as was discussed at this program at the SWAS, the upper and lower basin state groups have been dealing with significant differences and were not able to come to a consensus agreement.  As a result, the upper and lower basin delegations each submitted separate proposals to the BoR in early March.
There is still a chance that both the upper and lower basin state groups can reach a common agreement for a unified proposal.  In the meantime, both proposals are under review by the BoR. Officials with the BoR have indicated that they will be working with the basin states in the next six months to develop a consensus draft proposal for post-2026 river management by the end of 2024.
Further details on the two proposals submitted on 6 March 2024 by the upper and lower basin groups and contrasting the two will be forthcoming in a future article.
For the excellent program that was provided at the 2024 SWAS, I want to thank Elston, Bart, and Hank for their outstanding presentations.  Each of the participants in this program brought a wealth of knowledge and experience to the discussion.  
Specifically for Bart and Hank, we are all indebted to them for their contributions and hard work while serving on the lower basin state delegations during these critical and challenging negotiations.  Their firsthand perspectives and contributions to this program are very much appreciated.

Bindu Poudel-Ward, Martin Porchas Sr., Martin Porchas Jr., and  Neeraja Singh 
Yuma County Cooperative Extension, University of Arizona, Yuma, AZ

This study was conducted at the Yuma Valley Agricultural Center. The soil was a silty clay loam (7-56-37 sand-silt-clay, pH 7.2, O.M. 0.7%). Lettuce was seeded, then sprinkler-irrigated to germinate seed on Nov 28, 2023 on double rows 12 in. apart on beds with 42 in. between bed centers.  All other water was supplied by furrow irrigation or rainfall. Treatments were replicated five times in a randomized complete block design. Each replicate plot consisted of 25 ft of bed, which contained two 25 ft. rows of lettuce. Plants were thinned Jan 17, 2024  at the 3-4 leaf stage to a 12-inch spacing. Treatment beds were separated by single nontreated beds. Treatments were applied with a tractor-mounted boom sprayer that delivered 50 gal/acre at 100 psi to flat-fan nozzles spaced 12 in apart.
 

 
Sclerotia of Sclerotinia minor were produced in 0.25 pt glass flasks containing 15 to 20 sterilized 0.5 in. cubes of potato by seeding the potato tissue with mycelia of the fungus. After incubation for 4 to 6 wk at 68°F, mature sclerotia were separated from residual potato tissue by washing the contents of each flask in running tap water within a soil sieve. Sclerotia were air-dried at room temperature, then stored at 40°F until needed. Inoculum of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum was produced in 2 qt glass containers by seeding moist sterilized barley seeds with mycelia of the pathogen.  After 2 months incubation at 68°F, abundant sclerotia were formed. The contents of each container were then removed, spread onto a clean surface and air-dried. The resultant mixture of sclerotia and infested barley seed was used as inoculum. Lettuce ‘Magosa’ was seeded and then sprinkler-irrigation was initiated to germinate seed in double rows 12 inches apart on beds with 42 inches between bed centers.  Plants were thinned Jan 17, 2024 at the 3-4 leaf stage to a 12-inch spacing. For plots infested with Sclerotinia minor, 0.13 oz (3.6 grams) of sclerotia were distributed evenly on the surface of each 25-ft-long plot between the rows of lettuce and incorporated into the top 1 inch of soil. For plots infested with Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, 0.5 pint of a dried mixture of sclerotia and infested barley grain was broadcast evenly over the surface of each 25-ft-long lettuce plot, again between the rows of lettuce on each bed, and incorporated into the top 1-inch of soil. Treatment beds were separated by single nontreated beds. Treatments were replicated five times in a randomized complete block design. Each replicate plot consisted of a 25 ft length of bed, which contained two 25 ft rows of lettuce. Control plots received sclerotia but were not treated with any fungicide. 

            For treatments first applied at seeding, sclerotia were introduced into plots before the first application of treatments. The first application for at seeding treatments was made on Nov 28, with an additional application on January 17, 2024. Some treatments had second application on  Jan 30, 2024 (See table). For treatments first applied after thinning, sclerotia were introduced into plots after thinning before the first application of these treatments, with additional applications as noted in the data sheets. An initial sprinkler irrigation supplied water for seed germination, with subsequent furrow irrigations for crop growth. First sign of disease was observed on January 29, 2024. The final severity of disease was determined at plant maturity by recording the number of dead and dying plants in each plot due to Sclerotinia minor or Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (March 5, 2024).  As a point of reference, the original stand of lettuce was thinned to about 65 plants per plot.

In nontreated plots, about 32%  of lettuce plants were dead or dying due to infection with Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and  about 24 %  due to S. minor, at the end of the trial.  Please refer to the data tables to compare treatments of interest, using the Least Significant Difference Value listed at the bottom of each table to determine statistically significant differences among treatments. Miravis Prime, Luna Sensation and Elisys  gave the best results against Sclerotinia minor. Luna Sensation, Miravis Prime and Fontellis gave the best control against S. sclerotiorum (see table). From the list of treatments applied at seeding, Endura fb Merivon gave the best control against both species of Sclerotinia (see table). 
Phytotoxicity was not observed in any of the treatments in this trial. 

Our newly constructed self-propelled steam applicator is designed to inject steam into the soil and raise soil temperatures to levels sufficient to kill weed seed and soilborne pathogens (140°F for > 20 minutes). After the soil cools (< ½ day), the crop is planted into the disinfested soil. We have done some preliminary testing and are very encouraged. Results show that the machine is able to reach target temperatures at reasonable travel speeds, provide uniform temperature distribution across the bed and form nicely shaped beds suitable for subsequent planting. We still have some bugs to work out and identified improvements to make before shipping the unit to Salinas, CA where we will conduct field trials with crops this summer. If you are interested in seeing the machine operate or more information about soil steaming for soilborne pest control, please feel free to contact me.
Check out a video of the machine operating by clicking here or on the image below.

Fig. 1. Initial testing of self-propelled steam applicator video.

Acknowledgements
This project is sponsored and funded in part by the Propane Education and Research Council (PERC), Arizona Specialty Crop Block Grant Program and USDA-NIFA. We greatly appreciate their support.

We did some trials at the University of Arizona Yuma Agricultural Center in broccoli to evaluate and compare Napropamide (Devrinol) liquid formulation 2XT versus the Dry formulation DF-XT. 
This product inhibits the production of fatty acids in plants, which is crucial for plant development. It affects primarily the meristematic cells which are in growing points of the stems and roots. We saw activity especially on seedling development that we show in some pictures at the end of the article. 
Some growers expressed their concern on the safety of different levels of incorporation with sprinkler irrigation. Therefore, we established a test in which we applied the product as a broadcast application after planting. Then we used different levels of incorporation in some sections using 12, 24 and 36 hours of sprinkler irrigation. No difference was observed with the incorporation level in our trial. We observed temporary phytotoxicity from 4-10%. The data was obtained from visual evaluations. Also, a 0.5 to 1” height reduction was exhibited when compared to untreated plots. 
It is common that growers and PCAs make management decisions on herbicide applications in different crops knowing that some injury is expected. Such is the case for alfalfa, wheat, spinach, lettuce and in this case broccoli. Frequently slight stunting it is not noticed because commercial fields don’t have untreated areas for comparison.
We talked to PCA’s and growers at the SW Ag Summit and asked for their experience with napropamide this past season. Some noticed the broccoli exhibited similar levels of phyto, which they considered economically tolerable. 
We noticed that good soil prep was important for before the application of the product and avoiding direct contact of the seed with the product for best results.
On weed control we noticed good activity on nettleleaf goosefoot and lambsquarter. 
At the 45day we collected data counting SMALL and LARGE weeds and at the 60 day evaluation we noticed most of the SMALL goosefoot and lambsquarter in the high rate of napropamide plots stayed small (pic. below).

Area wide Insect Trapping Network   VegIPM Update, Vol. 15, No. 21, Oct 16, 2024

Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.

Corn earworm: CEW moth counts increased in most traps; about average for early October.

Beet armyworm: Trap counts increased in most areas last week, and about average for early October.

Cabbage looper: Cabbage looper trap counts still most locations, below average for this time of the season.

Diamondback moth: Adult activity increasing, particularly in the Yuma and Dome Valleys.  Above average for this time of season.

Whitefly: Adult movement increasing Tacna, Dome Valley and Yuma Valley; overall about average for early October.

Thrips: Thrips adult movement picking up in all areas, overall activity above average.

Aphids: Winged aphids beginning to show up the north Yuma and Gila Valleys; about average for early October.