Pest pressure in desert produce has begun to subside, but don’t become complacent.  Although the local weather forecast calls for below average temperatures for the next 10 days, conditions are still within the biological range of most of our fall pests.  And it’s quickly becoming ideal for aphids.   Below are some thoughts on the status of local pest pressure based on field sampling, trap counts and PCA reports.
 
Beet armyworm: Populations have been down for a couple of weeks, and spray intervals have lengthened. This isn’t surprising given the cooler temperatures we’ve experienced in the past 2 weeks. But be careful, they are still out there. Nighttime temperatures are still good for moth flights and oviposition.       

Cabbage loopers: were by far the most abundant Lepidopterous pest I saw this fall, but their numbers have dropped in the past 2 weeks. Be cautious though, they could surprise you, especially on produce approaching harvest.  Similarly, don’t relax with Corn earworms.  Although trap captures have been down the last 2-3 weeks, there have been a few problematic reports of larvae in head lettuce. As you know, it only takes a couple of these guys at harvest to ruin your day.   (See Corn Earworm on Desert Produce for more information).  

Diamondback moth: trap counts have been below average for most of the fall season, but we’re seeing an abundance of larvae on the Ag Center and have had reports from PCAs treating for larvae in both direct-seeded broccoli and transplanted cabbage and cauliflower. However, no reports of difficulty with control, and all the industry standard insecticides (e.g., Radiant, Coragen, Minecto Pro, Harvanta, Proclaim) have performed well in broccoli efficacy trials at YAC this fall. Remember, larvae hatch on outer leaves but quickly migrate to the growing point. Larvae also develop quicker and moths are more active than  armyworm, looper or earworms in cooler weather (see 2022 Guidelines for DBM Management in Desert Cole Crops for more information).

Thrips/INSV: In late October, we were seeing western flower thrips populations building on romaine at YAC, but areawide traps in lettuce, melons and alfalfa showed adult movement has decreased in the past 2 weeks. This is likely in response to cooler weather.   Because of INSV has moved into the desert again on coastal transplants, it is advised that PCAs keep thrips populations suppressed as much as possible in early fields (particularly on or near transplanted lettuce originating from Salinas). Since we’re beginning to detect INSV in adjacent direct-seeded fields, it might be worth making an extra spray just to prevent secondary spread to adjacent fields. Also, stress to your growers to disc under recently harvested lettuce/spinach fields ASAP. Remember the key to thrips control is to maintain larval populations at low levels. The cryptic or thigmotactic behavior of thrips often makes them difficult to find on lettuce plants. So, when scouting if you find a few, there are probably a lot more that you don’t see within the plant. For more information, please go to this link: Thrips and INSV Management in Desert Lettuce
 
Aphids: Reports of aphids beginning to colonize broccoli and lettuce are starting to come in, consistent with winds blowing in from the N-NW. Accordingly, we’re beginning to pick up green peach aphids on our sticky traps, particularly in the N. Gila and N. Yuma Valleys. However, they showed up later than normal, and we’re seeing lower numbers on the traps than we normally do this time of the year. Given the predicted La Nina weather pattern this winter, we could potentially see lighter aphid pressure this season. But that depends……. Remember, aphids are cool season pests on our produce crops and are most problematic when average temperatures fluctuate around 70° F.  Stay vigilant, proper ID is important for the selection of the most cost-effective insecticide. Like thrips, it’s best to “nip aphid colonization in the bud”.
 
Bob Dylan reminded us in song that    “you don’t need a weatherman to tell you which way the wind is blowing”

 Green peach aphids beginning to show up on desert Cole crops and lettuce.

When we go to the field to evaluate a crop, there are typically three fundamental points we need to take into consideration that include: 1) stage of growth, 2) general crop vigor and yield potential, and 3) anticipate the next stage of development and what we need to do in terms of field crop management.  These considerations are commonly focused on aboveground crop evaluations.  However, the root system is also an extremely important part of the crop condition to evaluate.  
 
Root systems were described in a basic manner in a recent article on 2 May 2023 (UA Vegetable IPM Newsletter Volume 14, No. 9).  
 
The effective root zone depth is the depth of soil used by the bulk of the plant root system to explore a soil volume and obtain plant-available moisture and plant nutrients.  Effective root depth is not the same as the maximum root zone depth. As a rule of thumb, we commonly consider about 70% of the moisture and nutrient uptake by plant roots takes place in the top 24 inches of the root zone; about 20% from the third quarter; and about 10% from the soil in the deepest quarter of the root zone (Figure 1).  
 
The small and very fine root hairs are the most physiologically active portion of a developing root system.  It is important that the plants continue to develop and generate fresh young roots and an abundance of fine root hairs to maintain water and nutrient uptake.

Figure 1.  General pattern for plant-water and nutrient uptake from the soil profile. 

It is important to point out that these general root development patterns are dependent on the nature of the soil profile in the fields.  Soil profiles with compaction layers, as well as rock or caliche layers will limit root development and full exploration of the soil volume that the plants are capable of (Figure 2).

Figure 2.  Generalized soil profile with major horizons.

Therefore, in scouting fields and making crop evaluations, examining the root systems is an important part of the process.  Leafy green vegetable crops need to develop a marketable plant in a relatively short amount of time and a strong root system is essential.  
 
It does take more time and effort to check root systems and it is a plant destructive process since we need to literally excavate the roots.  So, it is also important to be careful of where and how we sample plants and the root systems in a field.
 
Crop species can vary significantly in their patterns of root development and it is important to know what is “normal” when evaluating crops in the field.  An excellent reference for vegetable crop root system development is a 1927 publication by Dr. John E. Weaver and William E. Bruner from the University of Nebraska (Root Development of Vegetable Crops).  This publication can be found at the following link:
 
https://soilandhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/01aglibrary/010137veg.roots/010137toc.html
 
A few basic examples from the Weaver and Bruner publication are provided in the following figures (Figures 3-10).

Figure 3.  Cauliflower, 3 weeks after transplanting.



Figure 4.  Cabbage roots, 55 days after transplanting.



Figure 5.  Cabbage roots, 75 days after transplanting.



Figure 6.  Pepper roots, 24 days.



Figure 7.  Pepper roots, 45 days (6 weeks).



Figure 8.  Pepper roots, mature.



Figure 9.  Lettuce roots, 3 weeks.  The roots on the right were grown in compact soil, the roots on the
left were grown in loose/open soil.



Figure 10.  Lettuce roots, 60 days.

DISEASE: Center Rot of Onion
PATHOGEN: Pantoea ananatis, Pantoea agglomerans, Pantoea alli and Pantoea stewartii subsp. indologenes
HOSTS: Onion (Allium cepa L.), garlic (Allium sativum L.), shallots (Allium cepa var. aggregatum L.), leeks (Allium ampeloprasum L.), chives (Allium schoenoprasum L.).

Symptoms and signs
Center rot of onion has not been a major problem in the desert southwest but when the environment is favorable, the disease can cause up to 90% loss. Foliar symptoms (symptoms on leaves) may start with water-soaked lesions spanning the length of the leaf blade, which gradually become blighted resulting in desiccation and collapse of the tissue. Experiments have shown that the bacteria can move from leaves to the bulbs, thus protecting foliage is important to manage the disease.  
 
The  bacteria can overseason to infect onions in a number of different ways.  Like many bacterial pathogens, P. ananatis can be seed-borne with infested seed serving as a survival mechanism as well as a means of dissemination. It has been demonstrated that P. ananatis can be both naturally seed-borne and seed-transmitted in onion. The significance of the bacterium's ability to colonize seed is uncertain, as most onion seed production sites are located in arid climates but extremely important to understand to manage the disease. 
Although P. ananatis can be seedborne, the proposed primary mode of transmission is by two insect vectors. Two species of thrips, tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca (Hinds)) and onion thrips (Thrips tabaci), have the ability to transiently acquire and transmit P. ananatis and P. agglomerans . The bacterium can persist in a non-circulative manner in the gut of thrips for 128 h, allowing the vector to infect plants over an extended period of time. 
 
P. ananatis can survive epiphytically and endophytically on a wide range of hosts. These alternative hosts can serve as a source of inoculum in fields where susceptible crops are grown. In Georgia alone, 25 weed species, including carpetweed (Mollugo verticillata), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum), curly dock (Rumex crispus), Florida pusley (Richardia scabra), sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia), stinkweed (Thlaspi arvense), Texas panicum (Panicum texanum), vaseygrass (Paspalum urvillei), wild radish (Brassica spp.), yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and other multiple crop plants were found to harbor P. ananatis populations asymptomatically.

Pic Credit: Colton Tew

It’s October and planting season is well underway. When planting lettuce, uniform seed spacing is critical for efficient, economical crop thinning. Due to their lack of precision, automated lettuce thinning machines cannot eliminate lettuce plants that are spaced closer than about 1 1/8” apart. These closely spaced plants, commonly referred to as “doubles”, must be carefully removed by hand which is time consuming and expensive.

Several years ago, we conducted trials examining the influence of planter travel speed on seed spacing uniformity (Siemens and Gayler, 2016). In the study, two types of planters - a vacuum planter (Stanhay 785 Singulaire) and a belt planter (Stanhay 870) were tested with pelleted lettuce seed at travel speeds of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mph at the Yuma Agricultural Center. Vacuum planter test results showed that the percentage of “difficult to thin” spacings, defined seeds spaced less than 1.1” apart, increased from about 5% to 10% as speed increased from 1.0 mph to 2.5 mph (Fig. 1). Concomitantly, the percentage of seeds “precisely placed” within 0.5” of the target location (i.e., 2.0 ± 0.5”) decreased from 70% to less than 45%, and the percentage of skips increased from 7% to 30%. Variability of seed spacing uniformity as measured by the coefficient of variation (COV) of seed spacings also increased.

Similar declines in planter performance were found with the belt planter (Fig. 2). As travel speed increased from 1.0 to 2.5 mph, the percentage of difficult to thin spacings increased from 2% to 10%, precise spacings decreased from 93% to 65% and skips increased from 2% to 8%.

For both planter types, there was a significant decline in performance as speed increased from 1.5 mph to 2.0 mph, a difference in speed of only 0.5 mph. These results suggest that it is prudent to check planter performance at the chosen operating speed prior to establishing an entire block to ensure that seed spacing uniformity, not just the number of seeds per foot, is acceptable.

In short, the study showed that planter travel speed had a significant effect on seed spacing uniformity and difficult to thin, close spacings - the higher the speed, the poorer the performance.

You may be asking what is the reason for the phenomenon observed? A logical explanation is that seeds are traveling at the speed of the planter when they are released and tend to “bounce and roll” in the direction of travel when they hit the soil surface. Thus, the higher the travel speed, the further seeds bounce and roll resulting in increased seed spacing variability.

References

Siemens, M.C., & Gayler, R.R. (2016). Improving seed spacing uniformity of precision vegetable planters. Appl. Eng. Agric., 32(5), 579-587

Fig. 1. Seeding performance of a vacuum vegetable planter sowing lettuce when
operated at four travel speeds.


Fig. 2. Seeding performance of a belt vegetable planter sowing lettuce when operated at
four travel speeds

Sprinkler irrigation systems are delivering water throughout the Yuma CO. Either for germination or chemigations in lettuce, broccoli, onion and spinach.
How are you handling the absence of Dacthal (DCPA) in your operations?
One strategy that worked good in onions at the Gila Valley for one of our PCAs this week was the application of Prefar (bensulide) at 6qt. The weed complex he has included Purslane (Portulaca oleracea), Pigweed (Amaranthus palmeri), and is expecting later germination of Lambsquarter (Chenopodium album), Gooseofot (Chenopodium murale), and London Rocket (Sisymbrium irio). Control looks great and scouting the field in untreated areas we noticed there was a seedbank that could have caused a problematic infestation of purslane. The Pest Control Advisor is planning to include Goal (oxyfluorfen) in his weed control program later. 
We all know bensulide is an old treatment and many of you are using it, but our friend PCA wanted to share his experience just in case some of us have the same weeds.
If you would like to share with the Ag. community some of your experiences or new strategies used successfully, email the IPM Team. Also, please let us know if you like include a treatment or see a product tested in the onion and broccoli herbicide trials we are starting at the Experiment Station.
 
Following are links to some articles on onion weed control:
 
https://ag.arizona.edu/crop/vegetables/weeds/Dacthal.html
 
https://escholarship.org/content/qt91w4d06x/qt91w4d06x.pdf?t=lnryxp&v=lg
 
https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/handle/10150/221477/370100-165-167.pdf
 
https://ipm.ucanr.edu/agriculture/onion-and-garlic/herbicide-treatment-table/

Area wide Insect Trapping Network   VegIPM Update, Vol. 15, No. 20, Oct 2, 2024
 
Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.
 
Corn earworm:             
CEW moth counts low in most traps; below average for this early produce season. 
 
Beet armyworm:         
Trap counts decreasing in most areas, and below average for late September
 
Cabbage looper:          
Cabbage looper trap counts low in all locations, typical for mid-late September.
 
Diamondback moth:   
Adult activity beginning to pick up in Dome Valley.  Overall, typical of late September with minimal monsson activity.
 
Whitefly:                       
Adult movement most active in Dome Valley; overall below average for mid September
 
Thrips:                          
Thrips adult movement light; overall activity typical for September. 
 
Aphids:                        
Aphid movement absent so far; anticipate activity to pick up when winds beginning blowing from N-NW. 
 
Leafminers:                  
Adult activity light in all areas, about average for this time of season.