Green Peach Aphids / Lettuce Aphids:  Aphid populations remain relatively heavy so far this season. We are currently finding green peach aphid and lettuce aphid on lettuce/brassicas at YAC. Green peach aphid populations have remained steady on lettuce (10-15 /plant) and increasing rapidly on the brassica crops (>40/plant). This is above average for February, but I’ve seen heavier numbers in previous years.   In contrast, this is the earliest, most abundant, and most widespread I’ve observed lettuce aphid in desert lettuce since they first appeared over 20 years ago. Reports of heavy lettuce aphid pressure continue throughout the area, particularly Yuma Valley and Dome. This season lettuce aphids have been colonizing plants since December and are currently exceeding 100 aphids/plant in some untreated plantings at YAC. Unfortunately, they are likely to increase more rapidly with warmer weather forecasted for next week. Trials at YAC show that common aphid products (Sequoia, Beleaf, Versys, PQZ, Movento) are providing ~10 to 14-day activity on Green peach aphid; Movento is providing ~21 d control on Lettuce aphid. For more information on control visit Lettuce aphids on Desert Lettuce and 2022 Aphid Control.

INSV:   It was about this time last year that INSV was reported in the desert for the first time. Not surprisingly, INSV symptomatic plants have begun to show up again in desert lettuce following a similar pattern to what we observed last spring.  Currently we have confirmed INSV infected plants in direct-seeded lettuce grown in Tacna, Roll, Wellton, Dome Valley, Gila Valley, Yuma Valley and Bard.  However, the rate of INSV incidence in most fields is very light so far, averaging less < 0.5%. Our surveys show that lettuce fields currently infected with INSV are in proximity to ranches where transplanted lettuce was grown last fall.  Reports of symptomatic plants in late planted lettuce are starting to trickle in from growers and PCAS as well.  I encourage anyone spotting symptomatic plants in the next few weeks to let us know.  The more we understand this problem, the better chance we can solve it.

Thrips:   Western flower thrips abundance is beginning to build throughout the area and will likely increase rapidly on late lettuce where “bioconcentration" of thrips occurs each year as produce acreage declines near end of the season. This bottleneck effect concentrates high numbers of thrips adults on the remaining lettuce fields under production.  This can often make chemical control of thrips difficult, particularly in March, as thrips adults may continually re-infest fields following spray applications. It can also increase this risk of primary INSV spread by adults dispersing from infected fields. Accordingly, PCAs should be vigilant in their thrips control to minimize larval development and the potential for secondary, within-field INSV infection.  Efficacy trials at YAC currently show that Radiant and Lannate are providing a solid 10-day control of nymphs. For more information on thrips management and insecticide options in desert lettuce go to:   Rethinking Thrips Management in Desert Lettuce.

Leps:   Activity has been unusually low for the past several months and pheromone trap counts have been the lowest we’ve seen in several years for cabbage looper, beet armyworm and corn earworm. We’re picking up an occasional report of looper activity from PCAs. No reports of corn earworm to date. DBM moth trap counts are down compared to this time last season (see DBM Trap Network), and only a few reports of DBM in commercial fields. No issues in control have been reported. Nonetheless, keep a close eye out for all these Leps as they tend to build up rapidly with warmer weather late in the season

When going into the field to evaluate a crop, there are typically three fundamental points we need to take into consideration that include: 1) stage of growth, 2) general crop vigor and yield potential, and 3) anticipate the next stage of development and what we need to do in terms of field crop management.  These considerations are commonly focused on aboveground crop evaluations.  The root system is also an important part of the crop condition to evaluate but we commonly do not evaluate roots because of the difficulty in doing so.
 
Root systems and early development were described in a basic manner in a recent article on 4 September (UA Vegetable IPM Newsletter Volume 15, No. 18).  
 
The effective root zone depth is the depth of soil used by the bulk of the plant root system to explore a soil volume and obtain plant-available moisture and plant nutrients.  Effective root depth is not the same as the maximum root zone depth.  As a rule of thumb, we commonly consider that about 70% of the moisture and nutrient uptake by plant roots takes place in the top 24 inches of the root zone; about 20% from the third quarter; and about 10% from the soil in the deepest quarter of the root zone (Figure 1).  
 
The small and very fine root hairs are the most physiologically active portion of a developing root system.  It is important that plants continue to develop and generate fresh young roots and an abundance of fine root hairs to maintain water and nutrient uptake.

Figure 1.  General pattern for plant-water and nutrient uptake from the soil profile.

Root development patterns are dependent on the nature of the soil profile in the field.  Soil profiles with compaction layers, as well as rock, clay, or caliche layers can limit and alter root development and the full exploration of the soil volume that the plants are capable of (Figure 2).  So, it is good to know what the soil profile looks like in the field and understand how that will impact plant root development.

Figure 2.  Generalized soil profile with major horizons.

Leafy green vegetable crops need to develop a marketable plant in a relatively short amount of time and a strong root system is essential.  Transplants are commonly being used in vegetable crop production systems and the transition of transplants to field conditions is a major step in the production process.  The transition is primarily experienced by the plant below ground.  
 
Transplanted crops will have altered root systems due to the constraints within the rooting cone.  Further root development beyond the original cone rooting mass is important for crop success.  Thus, it is important to monitor the root system transition and the relationship to overall plant development.
 
Checking root systems is a plant destructive process since we need to literally excavate the roots from the soil and it does take time and effort.  Accordingly, it is also important to be careful of where and how we sample plants and evaluate the root systems in a field.
 
Crop species can vary significantly in their patterns of root development, and it is important to know what is “normal” when evaluating crops in the field.  An excellent reference for vegetable crop root system development is a 1927 publication by Dr. John E. Weaver and William E. Bruner from the University of Nebraska (Root Development of Vegetable Crops).  This publication can be found at the following link:
 
https://soilandhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/01aglibrary/010137veg.roots/010137toc.html
 
A few basic examples from the Weaver and Bruner publication are provided in the following figures (Figures 3-10).

Figure 3.  Cauliflower, 3 weeks after transplanting


Figure 4.  Cabbage roots, 55 days after transplanting.


Figure 5.  Cabbage roots, 75 days after transplanting.


Figure 6.  Pepper roots, 24 days.


Figure 7.  Pepper roots, 45 days (6 weeks).


Figure 8.  Pepper roots, mature.


Figure 9.  Lettuce roots, 3 weeks.  The roots on the right were grown in compact
soil, the roots on the left were grown in loose/open soil.


Figure 10.  Lettuce roots, 60 days.

This study was conducted at the Yuma Valley Agricultural Center. The soil was a silty clay loam (7-56-37 sand-silt-clay, pH 7.2, O.M. 0.7%). Variety: Deluxe (HMX2595) was seeded, then sprinkler-irrigated to germinate seed on March 20, 2024on 84 inches between bed centers. All other water was supplied by furrow irrigation or rainfall. Treatments were replicated five times in a randomized complete block design. Each replicate plot consisted of 25 ft of bed. Treatment beds were separated by single nontreated beds. Treatments were applied with a tractor-mounted boom sprayer that delivered 50 gal/acre at 100 psi to flat-fan nozzles spaced 12 in apart. 

Spray treatments were done on 05-21-2024, 05-31-2024, 06-07-2024 and 06-14-24. Powdery mildew was first seen on 06-05-24. Please see excel file for additional details.  

Disease severity of powdery mildew (caused by Sphaerotheca fuliginea and S. fusca) severity was determined 6-17-2024 by rating 10 plants within each of the four replicate plots per treatment using the following rating system: 0 = no powdery mildew present; 1 = one to two mildew colonies on leaves  ;2 = powdery mildew present on one quarter of leaves; 3 = powdery mildew present on half of the leaves; 4 = powdery mildew present on more than half of leaf surface area ; 5 = powdery mildew present on entire leaf. These ratings were transformed to percentage of leaves infected values before being statistically analyzed.

The data in the table illustrate the degree of disease control obtained by application of the various treatments in this trial. Most treatments significantly reduced the final severity of powdery mildew compared to nontreated plants. Quintec, Merivon, Tesaris, Luna Sensation, and V6M-5-14 V gave the best disease control. Phytotoxicity symptoms were not noted for any treatments in this trial.

ANR Webinar 10/17 click link for details.

Last week, we initiated our first on-farm demonstration of soil steaming of the season with our self-propelled steam applicator. The machine is designed to inject steam into the soil and raise soil temperatures to levels sufficient to kill weed seed and soilborne pathogens (140°F for > 20 minutes). After the soil cools (< ½ day), the crop is planted into the disinfested soil.
In this trial, we are examining the viability of soil steaming for controlling weeds in organic carrot at the field scale level (plot size > ½ ac). The machine performed well in that it was able to reach target soil temperatures at reasonable travel speeds (> 0.4 mph), provide uniform temperature distribution across the bed and form nicely shaped beds suitable for subsequent planting. Stay tuned for reports of weed control efficacy, crop yield and overall profitability as compared to the grower standard. 
We are seeking collaborators to conduct similar field-scale trials/demos in Yuma, AZ. The primary objectives are to assess the viability of soil steaming at the field-scale level and obtain grower feedback on the device’s commercial potential. The machine can be adjusted to work with most bed configurations including narrow (40”, 42”) and wide (80”, 84”) beds, and is suitable for use in conventional or organic crops (soil steaming is organically compliant). To date, the device has been successfully trialed in iceberg lettuce, romaine lettuce, baby leaf spinach and carrot crops.
If you are interested in an on-farm demo of soil steaming, please let me know. I’d be happy to work with you.

Fig. 1. On-farm demonstration of a self-propelled steam applicator for weed and
disease control

Acknowledgements

This project is sponsored and funded in part by the Arizona Specialty Crop Block Grant Program and the Propane Education and Research Council (PERC). We greatly appreciate their support.

According to some authors "the human brain can process images up to 60,000 times faster than words"¹. So, I decided to share images of some of the onion herbicide tests we did at the Yuma Ag Center last season hoping you find them interesting as the season progresses. As you know the products tested could respond differently under different environments. Also some of these trials are done searching for new alternatives, therefore products are not registered.

 

1. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-pictures-speak-louder-than-words-laura-nicole-brown#:~:text=According%20to%20Krista%20Neher%2C%20the,that%20really%20captures%20your%20attention.

Included below is a list of organic insecticides that you can consider for your organic IPM programs. Although there are few alternative organic insecticide options, it is important to rotate when possible. Like conventional insecticides, continuous exposure to the same biopesticides may pose some risk of further reducing their efficacy and leading to the development of resistance. 

A good organic insecticide rotation practice is to alternate selective organic insecticides with broad-spectrum organic insecticides. The use of selective organic insecticides favors the increase of beneficial arthropod populations which may help to keep the pest population in check and delay repeated application of insecticides. When the population of lepidopteran pests is low, spraying Bt-based insecticides first and pyrethrin or Spinosad-based products thereafter is a good strategy. Proper insecticide rotation is important because it can help reduce insecticide application frequency, resulting in reduced crop production costs. 

 Tank-mixing can help improve the efficacy of some organic insecticides against some target pests. Tank-mixing a Bt insecticide with pyrethrin, such as Xentari + Pyganic or Dipel + Pyganic, can be an effective combination for controlling lepidopteran larvae. Additionally, combining Pyganic and a neem-based insecticide like Aza-Direct can be a favorable combination for small lepidopteran larvae. Tank-mixing Entrust (spinosad) and M-Pede can help suppress flea beetles and bagrada bugs.

Corn earworm: Moth activity has declined in most areas and is about average for early-November. 

Beet armyworm: Moth activity has declined in most trap location and remains below average for this point in the season.

Cabbage looper: Cabbage looper activity remains unusually low for early November.  Trap catches picked up a bit in Wellton and Gila Valley.

Whitefly: Adult movement has been about average for this time of year. Activity highest in Wellton near fall melons being harvested.

Thrips: Thrips activity picking up significantly in several trap locations; activity increased significantly in Bard and Dome and Gila Valleys.  

Aphids: Aphid numbers peaked last week in many locations, particularly in the Gilas and Yuma Valleys.

Leafminers: Adult activity increased significantly last week, particularly in the Wellton area near melons.