With the produce season essentially finished, it’s time to begin thinking about insect management in melons. Spring melon crops are rapidly growing, and so are insect pest populations. Cabbage loopers and leafminers are becoming evident in some areas, and PCAs should start ramping up their monitoring and sampling. More importantly, whitely populations are quietly becoming abundant on the spring melons of all sizes. Adults can easily be found on recently planted melons located at the Yuma Ag Center, and reports from local PCAs suggest that adult populations are beginning to show up on older plantings. As temperatures increase and crops/weeds mature, avoidance of excessive feeding from whitefly nymphs should be the primary concern on all melon types. Although CYSDV does occur in later spring melons, it is rarely yield limiting. But honeydew and sooty mold contamination on cantaloupes, mixed melons and watermelons can significantly reduce quality and marketability is whiteflies are not adequately controlled.  Our research has shown that to prevent fruit yield and quality losses on spring melons, a foliar insecticide treatment should be applied on threshold; that is, when average adult numbers exceed 2 per leaf when averaged across an entire melon field. At this level of adult abundance, immature populations are beginning to colonize. Timing sprays based on the adult threshold has been shown to significantly reduce the chance of yield / quality losses during spring harvests.  This threshold applies for the use of recommended IGRs (Courier, Knack, Cormoran, and Oberon), foliar applied neonicotinoids (Assail, Venom, Scorpion), neonicotinoid-like compounds (Sivanto prime and Transform), diamides, (Exirel and Minecto Pro) and the feeding disruptors (PQZ and Sefina).  For more information on whitefly management and available insecticides, go to these documents on Insect Management on Spring Melons: Whiteflies and Whitefly Control Chart-Spring Melons -2024. Also, be aware of honey bees and other pollinators in or around melon fields. If bees are present, be sure to carefully read labels and determine bee safety of a product before making an application in a melon field.  If applications are necessary during bloom, only apply a product that is considered bee safe (e.g., PQZ, Sefina, Sivanto, Assail). We also recommend that insecticides only be applied when honeybees are not actively working in the field (e.g. 10:00 pm – 3: 00 am).

This study was conducted at the Yuma Valley Agricultural Center. The soil was a silty clay loam (7-56-37 sand-silt-clay, pH 7.2, O.M. 0.7%). Variety: Deluxe (HMX2595) was seeded, then sprinkler-irrigated to germinate seed on March 20, 2024on 84 inches between bed centers. All other water was supplied by furrow irrigation or rainfall. Treatments were replicated five times in a randomized complete block design. Each replicate plot consisted of 25 ft of bed. Treatment beds were separated by single nontreated beds. Treatments were applied with a tractor-mounted boom sprayer that delivered 50 gal/acre at 100 psi to flat-fan nozzles spaced 12 in apart. 

Spray treatments were done on 05-21-2024, 05-31-2024, 06-07-2024 and 06-14-24. Powdery mildew was first seen on 06-05-24. Please see excel file for additional details.  

Disease severity of powdery mildew (caused by Sphaerotheca fuliginea and S. fusca) severity was determined 6-17-2024 by rating 10 plants within each of the four replicate plots per treatment using the following rating system: 0 = no powdery mildew present; 1 = one to two mildew colonies on leaves  ;2 = powdery mildew present on one quarter of leaves; 3 = powdery mildew present on half of the leaves; 4 = powdery mildew present on more than half of leaf surface area ; 5 = powdery mildew present on entire leaf. These ratings were transformed to percentage of leaves infected values before being statistically analyzed.

The data in the table illustrate the degree of disease control obtained by application of the various treatments in this trial. Most treatments significantly reduced the final severity of powdery mildew compared to nontreated plants. Quintec, Merivon, Tesaris, Luna Sensation, and V6M-5-14 V gave the best disease control. Phytotoxicity symptoms were not noted for any treatments in this trial.

ANR Webinar 10/17 click link for details.

Two closely related but different species of several summer annual grasses are common in the low deserts. In general, these are all easy to distinguish from each other in the field and they respond similarly to herbicides. Some of these and their distinguishing characteristics are:

• Watergrass (Echinochloa colonum) and Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crusgalli)

 

These are very similar but watergrass has purple bands or chevrons on the leaves and barnyardgrass often has awns or bristles at the end of the spikelets. Both respond the same to herbicides.

• Red Sprangletop (Leptochloa filiformis) and Mexican Sprangletop (Leptochloa uninervia)

 

Red sprangletop is, in general, a lighter green color and has a finer seed head than does Mexican sprangletop which is darker green or gray and has a visibly coarser seedhead. Both form clumps or crowns that often survive through the winter months. Both are fairly tolerant to Poast (sethoxydim) and Fusilade (fluaziflop) but are controlled with high rates of Select (clethodim).

• Field Sandbur (Cenchrus pauciflorus) and Southern Sandbur (Cenchrus echinatus)

 

Both of these equally miserable weeds are only found in sandy soils and fairly easy to distinguish. Field sandbur has thinner, gray colored leaves and yellowish burs that are longer than broad. Southern sandbur has darker and broader leaves and fatter red colored burs. Southern sandbur has a more compact seed head with distinctly more burs than does southern sandbur. Both of these are fairly tolerant to Poast (sethoxydim), Select (clethodim) and Fusilade (fluaziflop).

• Southwestern Cupgrass (Eriochloa gracilis) and Prairie Cupgrass (Eriochloa contracta)

 

These similar grasses are fairly easy to distinguish in the field. Southwestern Cupgrass is one of the wider leafed grasses in the deserts. Prairie Cupgrass leaves are not as wide and are hairy. Southwestern is more branched than prairie and the ligule is shorter and less prominent. The branches are longer and fewer on prairie than on southwestern Cupgrass. Both respond the same to most herbicides.

• Green Foxtail (Setaria viridis) and Yellow Foxtail (Setaria glauca)

 

Both green and yellow foxtail typically form clumps, produce lots of seed and stand more upright than many other summer annual grasses. They are not difficult to distinguish in the field. Green has a darker greenish or brown seedhead compared to the yellow. The leaves of yellow are generally longer and have more bristles (5-20) per spikelet than green, which typically has 3 or less darker colored bristles. Both respond the same to most herbicides.

This link will connect you with a powerpoint presentation that will help in the identification of summer annual grasses in the deserts.

Area wide Insect Trapping Network   VegIPM Update, Vol. 15, No. 7, Apr 3, 2024
 
Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.
 
Corn earworm:            
CEW moth counts remain  at low levels  in all areas, well below average for this time of year. 
 
Beet armyworm:          
Trap increased areawide; about average compared to previous years.
 
Cabbage looper:           
Cabbage looper counts increased to seasonal highs; above average for this time of season.
 
Diamondback moth:       
DBM moth counts increased in most areas. About average for this time of the year.
 
Whitefly:                      
Adult movement negligible, average for late winter. 
 
Thrips:                          
Thrips adult counts increased in most areas. Below average compared with previous years.
 
Aphids:                         
Aphid movement decreased in all areas; below average for late-March.
 
Leafminers:                   
Adults remain low in most locations, average for March.