In the past week or so I’ve had numerous calls from PCAs in regards to control of whitefly adults and nymphs and specifically enquiring which products should be used. I previously discussed whitefly management briefly in our April 17th update (Vol. 4, No. 8), but thought it might be good to revisit the discussion now that daytime temperatures are in the low 100’s and whitefly populations have reached or are quickly approaching levels that require treatment. Several factors play a role in determining which insecticide(s) you may want to apply. First, population abundance should be one of the primary factors that determines which product you apply. If nymphs can easily be found on crown and mid-vine leaves, an IGR or IGR-like product is recommended. This would include: Vetica, Courier, Oberon, and Knack. None of these products will provide good adult knockdown, but if applied correctly, will eventually suppress adult populations by preventing the development of the nymphal infestation within the field. Control of adults infesting plants from outside sources will require a different approach. This time last year I would have recommended endosulfan, but of course that is no longer an option. A Vydate+bifenthrin or Danitol tank-mixture is an option, but will likely only provide adult knockdown, with limited residual control. Among the neonicotinoids, Assail and Venom/Scorpion are good options with decent residual control. Because neonicotinoids are used on many crops grown throughout the year be sure to consider resistance management statements on the label as well as the UA Cross-commodity Guidelines before you apply them. This brings up another factor that is important to consider – presence of pollinators in the field. Be sure to check the label carefully for the Environmental Hazards statement, specifically for language and restrictions on honey bee safety. In some cases, products can be used effectively and safely through application timing and rates, in other cases, some products should not be used when pollinators are actively working fields. You must read the label carefully. The proximity to harvest may limit your choices as well. The PHIs for whitefly products vary anywhere from 0-7 days. Also, the presence of worms near harvest may influence your choice of products. If you’re using a whitefly specific product (e.g., Courier, Oberon, Knack, Assail) you might consider adding a pyrethroid for cabbage looper control, or a Lep material (e.g., Intrepid, Coragen, Belt, Vetica) for control of both. Visit these publications for information on products available for Whitefly control and Lepidopterous larvae management.

As part of the SW Ag Summit that recently took place in Yuma, we conducted a breakout session on Thursday, 23 February 2023 titled “Colorado River Water Shortage: Agricultural Perspectives”.
This session provided a brief review of the background and current situation on the Colorado River and included perspectives from members of the lower Colorado River agricultural community including the Palo Verde Valley, Imperial Valley, and the Yuma area irrigation districts.   The program outline included the following participants:   
             
Colorado River Water Shortage: Introductory Overview      
                                    Jeff Silvertooth, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
 
Colorado River Water Shortage: Palo Verde Valley Perspective
Bart Fisher, Fisher Ranch, Blythe, CA           
 
Colorado River Water Shortage: Imperial Valley Perspective
                        Larry Cox, Lawrence Cox Ranches, Brawley, CA
 
Colorado River Water Shortage: Yuma Perspective
Elston Grubaugh, Wellton Mohawk Irrigation & Drainage District, Wellton, AZ 
 
Moderator:      Jeff Silvertooth
 


For geographic reference, Figures 1 and 2 provide maps of the lower Colorado River Valley and Yuma agricultural irrigation districts.
The session was not recorded but we do have each of the presentations available in the following links.
Jeff Silvertooth:
https://live-azs-vegetableipmupdates.pantheonsite.io/sites/default/files/2023-02/2023SWAS_JCS SWAS_ColoR Ag Perspectives_23feb23_FINAL_post.pdf
Bart Fisher:
https://live-azs-vegetableipmupdates.pantheonsite.io/sites/default/files/2023-02/2023SWAS_BF_SW%20Ag%20Summit%202023.pdf
Larry Cox:
https://live-azs-vegetableipmupdates.pantheonsite.io/sites/default/files/2023-02/2023SWAS_LC SWAS 23 February 2023.pdf
Elston Grubaugh:
https://live-azs-vegetableipmupdates.pantheonsite.io/sites/default/files/2023-02/2023SWAS_EG_02232023%20SW%20Ag%20Summit%20Panel_0.pdf
 
Also posted below is the link to an excellent video regarding Yuma Water and Ag that was recently developed and presented on 23 February by the Yuma Fresh Vegetable Association.
www.yumaagwater.com

Figure 1.  Map of the lower Colorado River including the dams, diversions,
and some of the major canal systems.



Figure 2.  Map of the Yuma area irrigation districts.   Source: Yuma Water Users Association, 2015.

This study was conducted at the Yuma Valley Agricultural Center. The soil was a silty clay loam (7-56-37 sand-silt-clay, pH 7.2, O.M. 0.7%). Lettuce was seeded, then sprinkler-irrigated to germinate seed on Nov 28, 2023 on double rows 12 in. apart on beds with 42 in. between bed centers.  All other water was supplied by furrow irrigation or rainfall. Treatments were replicated five times in a randomized complete block design. Each replicate plot consisted of 25 ft of bed, which contained two 25 ft rows of lettuce. Plants were thinned Jan 17, 2024  at the 3-4 leaf stage to a 12-inch spacing. Treatment beds were separated by single nontreated beds. Treatments were applied with a tractor-mounted boom sprayer that delivered 50 gal/acre at 100 psi to flat-fan nozzles spaced 12 in apart.

Month	Max Temp (°F)	Min Temp (°F)	Average Temp (°F)	Rainfall
November	80	51	65	0.08 in
December	71	44	57	0.82 in
January	68	42	54	1.14 in
February	73	47	59	0.50 in

 
Powdery mildew (caused by Golovinomyces cichoracearum) efficacy trial treatments were made on February 15,2024, February 23, 2024, March 4, 2024, and March 12, 2024and .Disease was first seen on February  26,2024. Disease rating was done on March 15, 2024.   Disease severity was determined  by rating 10 plants within each of the four replicate plots per treatment using the following rating system: 0 = no powdery mildew present; 0.5 = one to a few very small powdery mildew colonies on bottom leaves; 1 = powdery mildew present on bottom leaves of plant; 2 = powdery mildew present on bottom leaves and lower wrapper leaves; 3 = powdery mildew present on bottom leaves and all wrapper leaves; 4 = powdery mildew present on bottom leaves, wrapper leaves, and cap leaf; 5 = powdery mildew present on entire plant. These ratings were transformed to percentage of leaves infected values before being statistically analyzed. Yield loss due to rejected lettuce heads would likely begin to occur on plants with a powdery mildew rating above 2.0 (percentage of leaves infected value of 40).         
The data in the table illustrate the degree of disease control obtained by application of the various treatments in this trial. Most treatments significantly reduced the final severity of powdery mildew compared to nontreated plants. The most effective fungicides were Rhyme, Merivon, Quintec, Cevya, Luna Sensation, Luna Experience, and Elisys. 

At the 2023 Southwest Ag Summit Field Demo a couple of weeks ago, many of the latest technologies were demonstrated in the field. Most were related to pest control. Several of the technologies demonstrated or on display at the event are brand new to the Yuma, AZ area. The new technologies presented included an autonomous orchard sprayer (Fig. 1a), wide span (4 and 6 row) automated weeders (Fig. 1b, Fig. 1c), steam applicators for pre-plant weed control (Fig. 1d) and post-emergent weed control/crop desiccation (Fig. 1e) and a camera guided cultivator (Fig. 1f). This trend towards developing wider and more productive machine machines is indicative of a maturing industry. It will be interesting to watch these machines evolve further and become integrated in our cropping systems.

Fig. 1. New pest control technologies demonstrated/on display at the 2023 Southwest Ag Summit Field Demo included a) mini GUSS¹ autonomous orchard sprayer, b) K.U.L.T.i - Select automated weeder, c) FarmWise’s Vulcan automated weeder, d) UC Davis/UofA band-steam applicator, e) X-Steam-inator’s steam applicator and f) Mantis Ag Technology’s camera-guided cultivator. (Photo credits Fig. 1d: Mazin Saber, University of Arizona)
____________________
[1] Reference to a product or company is for specific information only and does not endorse or recommend that product or company to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.

Thank you for attending the Weed Control breakout session at the Southwest Agricultural Summit last week. Dr. Jesse Richardson presented the historical perspective on how the methods of applying Pronamide have been developed. Some of this information can be found in the following links:
https://cals.arizona.edu/crop/counties/yuma/farmnotes/2003/fn0803kerblettuce.html
 
https://live-azs-vegetableipmupdates.pantheonsite.io/sites/default/files/2023-03/Kerb%20Word%20slides.pdf
 
   Also Dr. Samuel Discua presented an update on the Survey of Weeds as Reservoirs of INSV in Yuma County and the presentation can be found here: 
 
https://live-azs-vegetableipmupdates.pantheonsite.io/sites/default/files/2023-03/SWAG%202023%20Weeds%20Survey%20Update%20.pdf
 
Dr. Jose Carvalho shared with us results from his research program at the Maricopa Agricultural Center including evaluations with the “King of Weeds” Palmer amaranth.
 
Additionally, some information was presented on Prefar Chemigation as well as the effect on spinach plantings if planted too early. The trials were done this season at the Yuma Agricultural Center and The Arizona Cooperative Extension will make videos of these presentations available soon.

Area wide Insect Trapping Network   VegIPM Update, Vol. 13, No. 1, Jan 12, 2022
 
Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.
 
Corn earworm:            
CEW moth counts remain low across all locations; average for this time of the season. 
 
Beet armyworm:         
Trap counts decreased in all locations, and well below average for mid- winter. 
 
Cabbage looper:           
Cabbage looper trap counts remained low in most locationssand below average for early January.
 
Diamondback moth:   
Adult activity steadily increasing during December. Above average for this time of year. Activity highest in Bard, Gila and Dome Valleys associated with nearby brassica seed crops. 
 
Whitefly:                      
Adult movement remained low in all locations consistent with previous seasons.
 
Thrips:                         
Thrips adult movement decreased in most locations last week, but increased sharply in Roll. Activity about average for mid-winter.
 
Aphids:                         
Aphid movement low in all locations. Trap captures average for this time of season. 

Leafminers:                  
 Adult activity decreased in all areas, about average for this time of season.