We are beginning to observe winged (alate) aphids appearing on desert lettuce and cole crops, but proper identification of winged aphid species found on leafy vegetables in the desert is important for cost-effective pest management. Most of the important aphid species we find on local crops do not over-summer here because of high temperatures and lack of viable hosts. Thus, winged aphids typically begin migrating onto desert crops beginning in late October-early November, often being blown in with the gusting winds. My experience over the past 20 years suggests this is due in part to cooler weather more favorable for their behavior and development, as well as changes in prevailing winds that now begin to blow into the area from the north and west. Consequently, once the aphids reach our desert valleys, they typically move from crop to crop until they find a suitable host to feed and colonize on. It is not uncommon to find winged aphids on lettuce or broccoli that are specific pests of small grains (i.e., corn leaf aphid) or alfalfa (i.e., pea aphid). Because these aphid species will not colonize lettuce, it is important to be able to distinguish them from the key aphid pests commonly found on lettuce that do colonize and require management to prevent problems at harvest (green peach aphid, foxglove aphid, lettuce aphid). Also, you are likely to find cowpea aphid in lettuce as it can be common in alfalfa at this time. However, experience has shown us that although small cowpea aphid colonies may be found on lettuce, the populations rarely increase in lettuce crops. The bottom line: proper aphid identification can save a PCA time and money, and prevent unnecessary insecticide applications. A simple pictorial key provides provides information that can assist PCAs with identifying winged aphids. important in lettuce and other leafy vegetables.

In the last issue of this UA Vegetable IPM Newsletter, I presented a melon (Cucumis melo ‘reticulatus’ L.) crop phenology model (Figure1; Silvertooth, 2025). This model can be useful in predicting and tracking crop development and identifying important stages of crop growth and development (crop phenology).

Use of a crop phenology model can be applied to basic crop management (e.g. fertilization, irrigation, harvest scheduling, pest management activities, labor, and machinery management, etc.). For use of the crop phenology model, good local weather data with heat unit information is needed. In Arizona we have an excellent weather system with the Arizona Meteorological Network, AZMET.

Since cantaloupes are a warm season crop, we use the86/55 ºF heat unit (HU) thresholds for phenological tracking. Key stages of growth or “guideposts” indicated in Figure 1represent the average or “target” values that are subject to a slight degree of natural variation, which is normal.

This melon crop phenology model was developed under fully irrigated and well-managed conditions. That is important since non-irrigated fields are more likely to experience water stress, which significantly disrupts crop development patterns.

Referring to the data from AZMET for several locations in the Yuma area, the HU accumulations (86/55 ºF thresholds) from 1 January 2025 to a set of four possible 2025 planting dates are listed in Table 1. The HU accumulations from 1 January2025 to 15 April 2025 for these sites are listed in Table 2.

The HU accumulations after planting (HUAP) for these four possible planting dates for three Yuma area locations to 15 April 2025 are shown in Table 3. The HUAP values in Table 3 are simply the difference between the values in Tables 1 and 2. An example for the Yuma Valley, 15 January 2025planting date is: HU - 73.1 HU = 645.6 ~ 646 HUAP.

The information in Table 3 can help serve as a reference to check for melon crop development in the field against this phenological model in Figure 2. Several cantaloupe/melon types are being in this region including western shipper type melons, Tuscan melons, and Hami melons. In the past, each of these melon types have tracked closely with this phenological model.

For melon crops in the lower Colorado River Valley at this time, we can expect to find fields planted and watered up in mid-January to have crown set melons beginning to develop netting, which may not be as apparent on the Hami melons. These fields could have crown fruit ready for harvesting in about three weeks, based on normal HU accumulation patterns for this time of year. For fields planted and wet dates near the first of March, these fields should be vigorously flowering.

 

Reference:
Silvertooth, J.C. 2025. Tracking Cantaloupe (Melon) Crop Growth and Development. University of        

Arizona Vegetable IPM Newsletter, Volume 16, No.7, 2 April 2025.


Table 1. Heat unit accumulations (86/55 ºF thresholds) after 1 January 2025 on four possible 2025 planting dates utilizing Arizona Meteorological Network (AZMET) data for each representative site.

Yuma Valley: https://azmet.arizona.edu/application-areas/heat-units/station-level-summaries/az02

Yuma North Gila: https://azmet.arizona.edu/application-areas/heat-units/station-level-summaries/az14

Roll: https://azmet.arizona.edu/application-areas/heat-units/station-level-summaries/az24

Table 2. Heat unit accumulations (86/55 ºF thresholds) after 1 January 2025 to 14 April
2025 utilizing Arizona Meteorological Network (AZMET) data for each representative site.


Table 3. Heat unit accumulations (86/55 ºF thresholds) after planting (HUAP) from four
possible 2025 planting dates and three sites in the Yuma area on 15 April 2025 utilizing
Arizona Meteorological Network (AZMET) data for each representative site. Each value
is rounded to the next whole number. Note: the values in Table 3 are determined by
taking the difference between the HUs foreach representative site and four planting
dates in Tables 1 and 2.


Figure 1. Melon (cantaloupe) phenological development model expressed in Heat Units
Accumulated After Planting (HUAP, 86/55°F).

DISEASE: Center Rot of Onion
PATHOGEN: Pantoea ananatis, Pantoea agglomerans, Pantoea alli and Pantoea stewartii subsp. indologenes
HOSTS: Onion (Allium cepa L.), garlic (Allium sativum L.), shallots (Allium cepa var. aggregatum L.), leeks (Allium ampeloprasum L.), chives (Allium schoenoprasum L.).

Symptoms and signs
Center rot of onion has not been a major problem in the desert southwest but when the environment is favorable, the disease can cause up to 90% loss. Foliar symptoms (symptoms on leaves) may start with water-soaked lesions spanning the length of the leaf blade, which gradually become blighted resulting in desiccation and collapse of the tissue. Experiments have shown that the bacteria can move from leaves to the bulbs, thus protecting foliage is important to manage the disease.  
 
The  bacteria can overseason to infect onions in a number of different ways.  Like many bacterial pathogens, P. ananatis can be seed-borne with infested seed serving as a survival mechanism as well as a means of dissemination. It has been demonstrated that P. ananatis can be both naturally seed-borne and seed-transmitted in onion. The significance of the bacterium's ability to colonize seed is uncertain, as most onion seed production sites are located in arid climates but extremely important to understand to manage the disease. 
Although P. ananatis can be seedborne, the proposed primary mode of transmission is by two insect vectors. Two species of thrips, tobacco thrips (Frankliniella fusca (Hinds)) and onion thrips (Thrips tabaci), have the ability to transiently acquire and transmit P. ananatis and P. agglomerans . The bacterium can persist in a non-circulative manner in the gut of thrips for 128 h, allowing the vector to infect plants over an extended period of time. 
 
P. ananatis can survive epiphytically and endophytically on a wide range of hosts. These alternative hosts can serve as a source of inoculum in fields where susceptible crops are grown. In Georgia alone, 25 weed species, including carpetweed (Mollugo verticillata), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum), curly dock (Rumex crispus), Florida pusley (Richardia scabra), sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia), stinkweed (Thlaspi arvense), Texas panicum (Panicum texanum), vaseygrass (Paspalum urvillei), wild radish (Brassica spp.), yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and other multiple crop plants were found to harbor P. ananatis populations asymptomatically.

Pic Credit: Colton Tew

For those interested in in-row weed control, checkout the quality video below (Fig. 1) on how finger weeders (Fig. 2) are being used on a 3,600 acre organic cotton farm in Texas. The grower states that finger weeders help him achieve 95-97% weed control and are a highly cost-effective tool for lowering hand weeding costs. 

Fig. 1. Carl Pepper discusses how finger weeders are used to control in-row weeds on
his 3,600 acre organic cotton farm. Click here or on image to view. (Photo credit: Tilmor
LLC, Dalton, OH)


Fig. 2. Finger weeders, an in-row weeding tool, operating in seedling cotton. Finger
weeder pairs are centered on the seed row and overlapped slightly to loosen soil in the
row and uproot small weeds.

Thank You

In 2010 we started publishing the Arizona Vegetable IPM Updates to a small number of friends. It was embraced by the community because of contributions from Mike Matheron, John Palumbo and Barry Tickes in the Plant Pathology, Entomology and Weed Science areas. Mike, John and Barry are the original IPM dudes. 

I was honored to be part of the team editing and sending the Newsletter for almost
16 years. 


This is my last update, and I would like to thank the UA team and the agricultural community for the opportunity to work with you. 

Biological control is an important IPM tool globally. This pest suppression technique is especially important for managing pests in organic crop production. There are various biological control techniques, including conservation biological control, classical biological control, and augmentative biological control. Conservation biological control is the practice of providing habitat to support abundant populations of naturally occurring arthropods that attack crop pests. However, classical biological control and augmentative biological control involve the release of arthropod predators and parasitoids, usually non-native, into the field or greenhouses. This article focuses on conservation biological control.

The contribution of native beneficial insects to pest control has been estimated to be approximately $4.5 billion annually in the United States alone. However, the benefits of beneficial insects areoften overlooked. Research conducted across the country has shown evidence that conserving natural habitats leads to an increase in beneficial arthropod populations and a reduction in pest problems on farms. Beneficial arthropod predators and parasitoids often rely on natural or semi-natural areas adjacent to the field for their persistence. Between growing seasons, these natural and semi-natural areas provide alternative food sources, overwintering, and nesting habitats for natural enemies, thereby promoting their populations. To complete their life cycle, natural enemies require more than just prey or hosts; they also need refuge sites and alternative food sources.

Neighboring natural and semi-natural habitats serve as sources of natural enemies during the growing seasons to suppress crop pests. The establishment of wildflower margins around crop fields increases the abundance of beneficial insects that search for pollen and nectar. For example, many adult parasitoids sustain themselves with pollen and nectar from nearby flowering plants while searching for hosts. Most natural enemies do not disperse far from their overwintering sites; access to permanent habitat near or within the field gives them a jump-start on early pest populations.

Farms with diverse and dense populations of natural enemies are likely to exhibit the following characteristics:

- Have small fields surrounded by natural vegetation.
- Composed of diversified cropping systems and plant populations in or around fields include perennials and flowering plants.
- Crops are managed organically or with minimal agrichemicals.
- Soils are high in organic matter and biological activity and, during the off-season, covered with mulch or vegetation.

Figure 1. Syrphid fly feeding from sweet alyssum flowers.


Figure 2. Mix flowers planted on strips between rows of celery to provide food and
shelter for natural enemies.

The combination of two separate processes whereby water is lost on the one hand from the soil surface by evaporation and on the other hand from the crop by transpiration, is referred to as evapotranspiration (ET). Evaporation is the process whereby liquid water is converted to water vapor (vaporization) and removed from the evaporating surface (vapor removal). Water evaporates from a variety of surfaces, such as lakes, rivers, pavements, soils, and wet vegetation. Energy is required to change the state of the molecules of water from liquid to vapor. Direct solar radiation and, to a lesser extent, the ambient temperature of the air provide this energy (Fig:1). 

Figure 1: Key factors driving ET in agriculture include solar radiation, temperature, wind,
humidity, and plant and soil water loss.

Transpiration consists of the vaporization of liquid water contained in plant tissues and the vapor removal to the atmosphere. Crops predominantly lose their water through stomata. These are small openings on the plant leaf through which gases and water vapor pass. The water, together with some nutrients, is taken up by the roots and transported through the plant (Fig: 2).

Figure 2: A diagram illustrates the process of transpiration in plants, where water is
absorbed by roots, moves through the stem, and evaporates from the leaf surfaces.

Why evapotranspiration (ET)?
ET is the largest component of the hydrological cycle and is one of the most critical variables in irrigation management, crop production, and the sustainability of agriculture. It has a direct impact on water resources availability and use, water quality, and the earth’s energy balance. Daily evapotranspiration (ET) rates are needed for irrigation scheduling. The evapotranspiration rate is normally expressed in millimeters (mm) or inches (in) per unit of time (e.g., an hour, day, week, month, or even an entire growing period or year).

Reducing evapotranspiration (ET) can lead to significant water savings by minimizing unnecessary water loss through soil evaporation and plant transpiration. By applying irrigation more efficiently only when and where it's needed, plants can maintain optimal moisture levels, reducing stress and promoting better growth. This can enhance nutrient uptake, improve plant health, and ultimately lead to higher yields. Moreover, conserving water through reduced ET is especially critical in arid regions, where freshwater resources are limited, and efficient water use is essential for sustainable agricultural production.

Below are strategies to reduce ET

• Irrigation Management: Implement precision irrigation by applying water only when needed based on real-time soil moisture data (Fig: 3). Use weather stations and sensors to optimize irrigation scheduling, and adopt drip or micro-irrigation systems to deliver water directly to the root zone, reducing evaporation and overall ET losses.
• Agronomic Strategies: Improve soil management through reduced tillage where applicable. While no-till is not typically suited for bedding systems used in leafy greens, other soil-conserving practices can still help retain moisture. Select crop varieties or hybrids that are more drought- and heat-tolerant, including short-season types to limit ET exposure. Adjust planting dates to avoid peak evaporative and heat stress periods, and adopt eco-fallow crop rotations (e.g., two crops over three years) to enhance soil water conservation and reduce overall ET.

Figure 3: Figure 3. Soil moisture sensor installation at the Valley Research Center,
Yuma, AZ.

Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.

Corn earworm: CEW moth counts down in most traps over the last week; about average for early October.

Beet armyworm: Trap counts increased in several areas last week, and about average for early October.

Cabbage looper: Cabbage looper trap counts increased in most locations, but still below average for this time of the season.

Diamondback moth: Adult activity spiked 2 weeks ago, particularly in the Yuma and Dome Valleys, but down over the past week. Average for this time of season.

Whitefly: Adult movement increasing Tacna consistent with melon harvests; overall about average for early October.

Thrips: Thrips adult movement peaked 2 weeks ago but down ovr the past week, overall activity above average.

Aphids: Winged aphids beginning to show up the north Yuma and Gila Valleys; below average for October.

Leafminers: Adult activity increased significantly last week in several locations, above average for this time of season.