Temperatures are still warm and worm pressure remains steady in most growing areas.   Here at the Ag Center, beet armyworm pressure is about average for early October, and still troublesome on new stands. Cabbage looper eggs are beginning to now show up. Pheromone trap counts for armyworm and loopers remain below average in most areas. However, diamondback moth larvae are present on broccoli and transplants at the Ag Center.  I’ve had several PCA reports of diamondback pressure in transplanted brassica crops in Wellton and Roll, and in the Yuma Valley. Trap catches have begun to increase also. So far, all insecticide products we’ve tested are providing good Lep control and no complaints from the field.  
 
Fortunately for local PCAs, several insecticide alternatives are available that provide excellent residual activity on Lep pests.   Perhaps equally important, many of the products have unique modes of action (MOA) that can be alternated throughout the growing season. This is important because the most fundamental way to reduce the risk of insecticide resistance is to eliminate exposure of multiple generations of Leps to the same MOA.   By using a different MOA on each subsequent spray application, you can minimize the risk of resistance by Lep larvae to these insecticide compounds. In contrast, repeatedly applying insecticide products with the same MOA for Lep control in the same area will significantly increase the risk of resistance.  This is particularly important with the Diamide group of insecticides (IRAC group 28). These products can be applied as both foliar sprays and soil systemic treatments, and currently 7 Diamide products are labeled for use in leafy vegetables - all with the same MOA (Coragen, Durivo, Besiege, Minecto Pro, Verimark, Exirel and Harvanta).  To avoid confusion among the Diamides, the IRAC group number (28) is placed on each label, adjacent to the product name.  Furthermore, applying a Diamide product (i.e., Coragen/Verimark) to the soil at planting or as a tray drench, and then subsequently applying Diamide foliar sprays (i.e., Harvanta/Besiege) on the same field is not a good idea as it can expose multiple generations of Leps to the same MOA.  For example, under ideal weather conditions, one could potentially expose 5-6 generations of BAW or DBM to the same MOA given the residual efficacy of the diamides.  That’s not a good way to use these products if you want them to remain effective.   Since the Diamides, as well as the other key products currently available (e.g., Radiant, Proclaim, Intrepid, Avaunt, Bts), are critical to effective management of Leps in leafy vegetables, PCAs should consciously avoid the overuse of any of these compounds. The most effective way to delay the onset of resistance by Leps in leafy vegetables is to consider the recommendations provided in the guidelines entitled Insecticide Resistance Management for Beet Armyworm, Cabbage Looper and Diamondback Moth in Desert Produce Crops.

John Wesley Powell, the Civil War veteran who lost most of his right arm at the Battle of Shiloh, led his first expedition down the Green and Colorado Rivers, including the Grand Canyon in 1869.  This provided the first exploration of the Colorado River basin by Americans of European descent and it began the process of understanding the nature of western territories of the United States, including Arizona (Figure 1).
 
The degree of aridity of this region was very strongly impressed upon Powell and he spent much of his life working to educate law and policy makers of the conditions prevalent in the western U.S.  He worked diligently with lawmakers, government experts, and citizens to communicate the fact that the development of the western territories, which the nation was rapidly embarking on after the Civil War, would be limited due to the lack of water.  His comments to the Montana Constitutional Convention in 1889 “All the great values of this territory have ultimately to be measured to you in acre feet” is a good example of his basic message and it has proven to be quite prophetic in our experiences of living and working in the desert Southwest in the 20^th and 21st centuries.
 
Powell became the second director of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) from 1881 to 1894.  In this and similar capacities, he constantly advocated for policies for the development of the arid West that were consistent with the prevailing arid conditions.  As the lands in the western U.S. were being developed, the need for land “reclamation” was recognized.  It was 120 years ago this week, on 17 June 1902 that Theodore Roosevelt signed the Reclamation Act and the U.S. Reclamation Service (USRS) was formed within the USGS under the Secretary of the Interior Ethan Allen Hitchcock.  The new USRS was given the responsibility of studying potential water development projects in each western state with federal lands.  Revenue from the sale of federal lands was the initial source of the USRS funding.
 
Thus began the process of the USRS in the development of about 30 western water projects between 1902 to 1907.  In 1907, the Secretary of the Interior separated the USRS from the USGS and created the Bureau of Reclamation (BoR) as a distinct entity within the Department of the Interior.  The Boulder Canyon (Hoover Dam) project was authorized in Congress in 1928 and funded by general funds appropriated by Congress to the BoR, and from that the development of Lake Mead began.  Lake Mead is the main storage reservoir for the lower basin of the Colorado River.
 
In the late 19^th and early 20^th centuries, efforts in the western U.S. to develop lands for agriculture encountered problems with lands and soils that were found to be unsuitable for irrigation, often due to salinity, sodicity, and drainage problems.  The “reclamation” of these lands became an important part of the BoR objectives and operations.  All this development was dependent on the availability of water and good land and water management capacities.
 
During the 20^th century, the BoR was responsible for some tremendously large and ambitious projects, including Boulder Dam, Grand Coulee Dam, Glen Canyon Dam, and many others.  Today, the BoR operates in 17 western states with water and electrical power projects with more than 600 dams, reservoirs, powerplants, and canals.  The BoR is the largest wholesaler of water in the U.S. and supports irrigation water storage and conveyance throughout the west on farmlands that produce more than 60% of the nation’s vegetables and 25% of the fruit and nut production in the country. The BoR is the second largest producer of hydroelectric power in the U.S. with 53 powerplants.  The western U.S. development and population is heavily dependent on the BoR water and power works.
 
In Arizona and the desert Southwest, the lands and people here today have a very close relationship to the BoR for water and electrical power.  All the lands along the mainstem of the Colorado River and the Central Arizona Project (CAP) are intimately connected to the BoR.  Our efforts to deal with the water shortages on the entire Colorado River system are some of the greatest challenges this region and the BoR have faced since the early days of development in the 19^th century.  
 
Thus, there are many participants in the process of dealing with the current water shortage on the Colorado River system, including the U.S. Department of the Interior, the BoR, and all the basin states.  An accentuating feature of the current water shortage on the Colorado River is due to the fact that for the past 22 years, the average annual flow in the Colorado River has been ~ 12.4 million acre-feet (maf) while the Colorado River water is budgeted for a total of 16.5 maf of allocations between U.S. states and Mexico. 
 
Essentially, all of us living in the desert Southwest are in this together; including agricultural, urban, and tribal entities.  All parties involved must work together to resolve this disparity between the water that the river is providing and the greater amount that is desired and allocated.  The issues and general situation that we are facing has an urgency that requires immediate attention.  I remain hopeful that we can meet the challenges of our time as our predecessors did in the past.

 

Bacterial soft rot in lettuce can occur in the field as well as post harvest. 
It is caused by several types of bacteria, but primarily subspecies and pathovars of Erwinia caro-tovora and E. chrysanthemi. Other bacterial species that cause soft rot include Pseudomonas cichorii, P. marginalis, and P. viridiflava. They have a wide host range host range and  includes genera from nearly all plant families
 
In lettuce fields, the symptoms are observed close to the harvest  time. The tissue, mostly around inside the head of head lettuce  softens and becomes mushy or watery. Slimy masses of bacteria and cellular debris frequently ooze out from cracks in the tissues. Decaying tissue, which may be opaque, white, cream-colored, gray, brown, or black frequently gives off a characteristically putrid odor. The odor is caused by secondary invading bacteria
that are growing in the decomposing tissues.
 
The bacteria overwinter in infected fleshy tissues in storage, in the field, garden or greenhouse, in the soil (especially in the rhizosphere around the roots of many plants), and on contaminated tools, equipment, containers, and in certain insects. The bacteria enter primarily through wounds made during planting, cultivating, harvesting, grading, and packing and through freezing injuries, insect and hail wounds, growth cracks, and sunscald. They may
also follow other disease-producing organisms. Uninjured tissues may become infected when the humidity approaches 100 percent or when free moisture is present. Rains, poorly drained or waterlogged soils, and warm temperatures favor infection in the field, as does high humidity in storage or transit.
 
The bacteria multiply rapidly by dividing in half every 20 to 60 minutes under ideal conditions at
temperatures between 65° and 95° (18° and 35°C). Minimum temperatures for development is between 35° and 46°F (2° and 6°C); and maximum between 95° and 105°F (35° and 41°C. 
 
The bacteria are spread by direct contact, hands, tools and farm machinery, insects, running or splashing water, contaminated, water in washing vats, clothing, and decayed bits of tissue.
  
Management
Promptly and carefully destroy infected plants. Maintain well aerated field, avoid close planting and overhead irrigation. 
To minimize post harvest losses, avoid mechanical injusry after harvest, packing and shipping. Do not pack produce when wet. Store and ship produce at temperatures near 4°C (39°F).
 
Source: IPM.Illinois.edu

Interested in staying up to date on the latest international robotic ag technologies? FIRA (International Forum for Agricultural Robotics) held an “Open Day” May 13th and posted recorded presentations on their website. In addition to technical panel discussions with industry experts, the event included live field demos of weeding, scouting and general farming robots. The FIRA Connect website also has replays of presentations given at the 2021 FIRA Conference held last December. In total, there are thirty short presentations and field demos of ag robots freely available. About 1/3^rd of the presentations/demos are weeding machines from Europe that utilize various methods for in-row weed removal – lasers, precision spot sprayers, concentrated light beams, and mechanical devices including knife blades, rotating heads, and weed pulling mechanisms. The site also provides links to a “Robot Wall” and a “R&D Wall” where companies have posted information about their commercially available and in-development ag robots. It is a quality website and worth checking out to learn more about the latest automated agricultural technology innovations being developed around the world. 

To connect to the FIRA website, click here

We have established some experiments at the Yuma Agricultural Center to evaluate herbicides in lettuce transplant. The purpose of the trials was to determine Crop safety and weed control in our desert conditions as well as targeting the weed species present in the area. One of the herbicides tested is DCPA (Dacthal).
DCPA (dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate) is an herbicide that was first registered in the United States in 1958⁽¹⁾ and was among the first herbicides tested in lettuce. It has been used pre-emergence and established turf, ornamentals, and brassica crops, cucumbers, beans, melons, garlic, greens, squash, horseradish, eggplant, onions, yams, tomatoes, peppers, potatoes, strawberries, and cotton. DCPA Controls several annual broadleaves and grass weeds⁽²⁾.
A broadcast application of DCPA was done Pre and Post-transplant at the rate of 7pt/a with a CO₂ Backpack R&D sprayer at the volume of 20 gallons per acre and with 8002 VS flat fan nozzles. 
We observed in our trial that DCPA at the rate of 7pt/a was safe to transplanted iceberg lettuce (variety Bubba), and showed similar control of Purslane as Pronamide (Kerb) at the rate of 2 pt./a.
Would you like to see more results from our evaluations with other products such as Prowl H₂O, Dual Magnum, Facet, and Kerb?
You are invited to come and have a conversation with us in our 2022 Lettuce Crop Losses Workshop TODAY AT 11:30 AM at the Yuma Agricultural Center. Lunch is on us provided by the University of Arizona Pest Management Center.

Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.

Corn earworm: CEW moth counts down in most over the last month, but increased activity in Wellton and Tacna in the past week; above average for this time of season.

Beet armyworm: Moth trap counts increased in most areas, above average for this time of the year.

Cabbage looper: Moths remain in all traps in the past 2 weeks, and average for this time of the season.

Diamondback moth: Adults decreased to all locations but still remain active in Wellton and the N. Yuma Valley. Overall, below average for January.

Whitefly: Adult movement remains low in all areas, consistent with previous years.

Thrips: Thrips adults movement decreased in past 2 weeks, overall activity below average for January.

Aphids: Winged aphids are still actively moving, but lower in most areas. About average for January.  

Leafminers: Adult activity down in most locations, below average for this time of season.