The NOAA's Climate Prediction Center predicts that a moderate to strong La Niña will be the dominant climate factor influencing weather in Arizona and California this winter. This suggests that our local weather should be warmer and drier than average from December through February. So what impact will this have on insect pests normally found on leafy vegetables and melons this winter? Not real certain since predicting insect abundance is like predicting the weather. However, like the NOAA, we have collected data over the years that suggests that aphid pressure on lettuce is historically lighter during growing seasons when rainfall amounts are low (<0.25 inches). Similarly, seed corn maggot infestations are generally less severe under warm and dry growing conditions during the winter. In contrast, western flower thrips abundance has historically been higher under warm and dry weather conditions. Last winter (Jan-Mar) we received over 4 inches of rain in the Yuma Valley and thrips numbers were very low in our research trials, and seed corn maggots were quite damaging in a number of crops last spring. Thus, if one chooses to rely on the La Nina predictions, one might predict that aphid and seed corn maggot pressure will be lighter, and thrips numbers much heavier this winter and spring. But keep in mind there are a number of other abiotic and biotic factors that also influence insect abundance. Historical trends in insect abundance on desert crops and guidelines for their management were presented at the 21st Annual Desert Crops Workshop in El Centro last week. A copy of that presentation can be found at this link.

Whenever we go to the field to evaluate a crop, there are typically three fundamental points we need to take into consideration that include: 1) stage of growth, 2) general crop vigor and condition, and 3) anticipate the next stage of development and what we need to do in managerial response.  These considerations are commonly focused on aboveground crop evaluations.  However, the root system, completely belowground, is an extremely important part of the crop condition to evaluate.
 
Root systems are responsible for all water and nutrient uptake by the plant and provides the physical anchoring and support of the plant structure.  Each plant and crop species has its own “personality” and growth habits and the nature of the root systems also vary among plants species.  Many plant species can have root systems that constitute ~ 50% of the total plant dry matter and we generally consider plants to have at least 30% of total plant dry matter allocated to the root systems.
 
Young plants will often develop some basic aboveground tissue to perform sufficient photosynthesis for establishment and then devote a high amount of the energy, carbohydrates produced, along with the nutrients and water from the soil to root system growth and development. Sometimes it can appear that plants are not growing rapidly while investing energy and resources into root system development.  The depth of the roots will vary according to the soil physical conditions and effective soil depth, soil fertility and salinity management, plant-available water, and of course the natural rooting characteristics of the plant.  
 
The effective root zone depth is the depth of soil used by the bulk of the plant root system to explore a soil volume and obtain plant-available moisture and plant nutrients.  Effective root depth is not the same as the maximum root zone depth. As a rule of thumb, we commonly consider about 70% of the moisture that is taken up by the root is obtained in the top half of the root zone; about 20% from the third quarter; and about 10% from the soil in the deepest quarter of the root zone.  The small and very fine root hairs are the most physiologically active portion of a developing root system.  It is important that the plants continue to develop and generate fresh young roots and an abundance of fine root hairs to maintain water and nutrient uptake.
 
Therefore, in scouting fields and making crop evaluations, examining the root systems is an important part of the process.  Leafy green vegetable crops need to develop a marketable plant in a relatively short amount of time and a strong root system is essential.  It does take more time and effort to check root systems and it is a plant destructive process since we need to literally excavate the roots.  So, it is also important be careful of where and how we sample plants and the root systems in a field.

This study was conducted at the Yuma Valley Agricultural Center. The soil was a silty clay loam (7-56-37 sand-silt-clay, pH 7.2, O.M. 0.7%). Lettuce was seeded, then sprinkler-irrigated to germinate seed on Nov 28, 2023 on double rows 12 in. apart on beds with 42 in. between bed centers.  All other water was supplied by furrow irrigation or rainfall. Treatments were replicated five times in a randomized complete block design. Each replicate plot consisted of 25 ft of bed, which contained two 25 ft rows of lettuce. Plants were thinned Jan 17, 2024  at the 3-4 leaf stage to a 12-inch spacing. Treatment beds were separated by single nontreated beds. Treatments were applied with a tractor-mounted boom sprayer that delivered 50 gal/acre at 100 psi to flat-fan nozzles spaced 12 in apart.

Month	Max Temp (°F)	Min Temp (°F)	Average Temp (°F)	Rainfall
November	80	51	65	0.08 in
December	71	44	57	0.82 in
January	68	42	54	1.14 in
February	73	47	59	0.50 in

 
Powdery mildew (caused by Golovinomyces cichoracearum) efficacy trial treatments were made on February 15,2024, February 23, 2024, March 4, 2024, and March 12, 2024and .Disease was first seen on February  26,2024. Disease rating was done on March 15, 2024.   Disease severity was determined  by rating 10 plants within each of the four replicate plots per treatment using the following rating system: 0 = no powdery mildew present; 0.5 = one to a few very small powdery mildew colonies on bottom leaves; 1 = powdery mildew present on bottom leaves of plant; 2 = powdery mildew present on bottom leaves and lower wrapper leaves; 3 = powdery mildew present on bottom leaves and all wrapper leaves; 4 = powdery mildew present on bottom leaves, wrapper leaves, and cap leaf; 5 = powdery mildew present on entire plant. These ratings were transformed to percentage of leaves infected values before being statistically analyzed. Yield loss due to rejected lettuce heads would likely begin to occur on plants with a powdery mildew rating above 2.0 (percentage of leaves infected value of 40).         
The data in the table illustrate the degree of disease control obtained by application of the various treatments in this trial. Most treatments significantly reduced the final severity of powdery mildew compared to nontreated plants. The most effective fungicides were Rhyme, Merivon, Quintec, Cevya, Luna Sensation, Luna Experience, and Elisys. 

Mark C. Siemens Vol. 12, Issue 20, Published 10/06/2021 Plans are shaping up for the 2nd Automated Weeding Technologies Field Demo Day. The event will be held Thursday, October 21st at the Yuma Agricultural Center. Registration begins at 7:00 am and the program starts at 7:30 am. We have eight presentations/field demos scheduled (details below). The focus this year is on the latest automated weeding technologies that are “new” since our 2018 event. We would love to showcase as many innovations as possible and it’s not too late to be added to the program. It’s an open invitation - private companies, university and government researchers are all welcome to show their technology. Please contact me if you are interested or know someone that is.

An increasingly diverse number of minor acreage specialty crops are grown in this region every year. Managing some of these crops can be difficult without local experience. It is helpful to at least know what botanical family they belong to because crops in the same family often have similar growth habits, pest problems and fertility requirements. There are almost no pesticides registered for some of these crops because of the limited acreage, but response to pesticides is often, but not always, similar to that of other crops in the same family. Knowing the family they are in can often give you an idea of what to expect. Kerb, for instance, is generally safe to crops in the Composite family (Lettuce, artichokes, radicchio) but is harmful to crops in the brassica family (Broccoli, cabbage, bok choy). The following chart lists crops by botanical family. 

Crop Families

Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.
 
Corn earworm:             
CEW moth counts are down areawide consistent with this time of year. 
 
Beet armyworm:         
Trap counts increased in most locations, and are about average compared to previous years.
 
Cabbage looper:           
Cabbage looper counts declined  all  traps, well below average for this time of season.
 
Diamondback moth:      
DBM moths counts have declined and well below average for this time of the year.
 
Whitefly:                      
Adult movement decreased in the past 2 weeks, and remains below average for this time of year. 
 
Thrips:                          
Thrips adults decreased in most locations with the exception of Tacna. Currently, below average for Novenber.
 
Aphids:                        
Aphid movement loght, but most active in in North Yuma Valley and Gila Valley. Below average for November.
 
Leafminers:                  
Adult activity up in a few locations, but well below average.