In Arizona, the diamondback moth (DBM) is typically considered a minor pest that occasionally builds up to damaging levels in the winter and spring. In most years, growers can easily control the pest with 1-2 well timed insecticide sprays. However, beginning in October 2016 outbreaks of an invasive DBM population occurred throughout all vegetable growing regions in Arizona and continued throughout the remainder of the spring growing season. Cole crops that were affected included broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage, kale, mizuna/arugula, Napa cabbage, bok choy, Brussel sprouts and Brassica seed crops. It was quickly determined that the source of the DBM populations originated from infested transplants grown in local desert greenhouses. Within weeks of transplanting, PCAs and growers found that they could not adequately control the DBM infestations. To further complicate the situation, it was later discovered that the invasive DBM population was very resistant to the anthranillic diamide insecticides that are commonly used to control Lep larvae. After the first transplanted fields began to harvest in November, several growers reported that seriously infested fields suffered significant yield reductions, and incurred extremely high control costs. By late December, DBM populations began to spread from the infested transplanted fields to direct-seeded crops throughout the region, causing further losses. By February, reports of infested broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower fields were routine. The DBM infestations experienced by Arizona growers in 2016-17 were not anticipated, and the resistant population that entered the desert caused serious losses in cole crops. It has been suggested that the DBM outbreaks this year were comparable in severity to the early sweetpotato whitefly outbreaks in 1992. In an attempt to document the impact of the DBM outbreaks on Arizona cole crops, we conducted a two-part survey of growers and PCAs from Yuma and Maricopa Counties in April 2017 to (1) estimate the severity of yield losses to DBM on direct-seeded and transplanted cole crops, and (2) the intensity of chemical management required to control DBM, and associated level of control provided by each insecticide product used. To download a copy of the survey results, please go to Impact of Diamondback Moth Outbreaks on Arizona Cole Crops in 2016-17.

In response to the recent outbreaks of Diamondback moth (DBM) , Plutella xylostella in Yuma, we have established a pheromone trap network designed to monitor the activity and movement of adult populations of DBM. PCAs have had difficulty controlling DBM in cabbage, broccoli and cauliflower since October. Traps have been placed in Roll, Wellton, Dome Valley, Gila Valley and Yuma Valley in locations where cole crops are presently being grown or in areas where infestations were known to occur this fall.

This study was conducted at the JV farms at Gila Valley. Lettuce variety ‘Guapo’ was seeded, then sprinkler-irrigated to germinate seed on September 19, 2023, on double rows 12 in. apart on beds with 42 in. between bed centers.  Rest of the irrigation was supplied by furrow irrigation or rainfall. Treatments were replicated five times in a randomized complete block design. Each replicate plot consisted of 25 ft of bed, which contained two 25 ft rows of lettuce. Plants were thinned on October 9, 2023 at the 3-4 leaf stage to a 12-inch spacing. Treatment beds were separated by single nontreated beds. Treatments were applied by incorporating in soil before seeding or with a tractor-mounted boom sprayer that delivered 50 gal/acre at 100 psi to flat-fan nozzles spaced 12 in apart.

Month	Max	Min	Avg	Rain
September	100	71	86	0.71 in
October	93	61	77	0.00 in
November	80	51	65	0.08 in
December	71	44	57	0.82 in

 
Fusarium wilt (caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae ) rating was done in the field by observing the typical symptom of lettuce wilt. Confirmation was done by cutting the cross section of roots. Disease scoring/rating was done on December 6, 2023. 
 
The data in the table illustrate the degree of disease control obtained by application of the various treatments in this trial. The disease pressure was extremely high in 2023, and most treatments showed little or no control against the disease. The treatments that showed some activity were Bexfond, Cevya, Rhyme, and Serifel. Plant vigor was normal and phytotoxicity symptoms were not observed in any treatments in this trial.

In 2018, University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Yuma Agricultural Center and the Yuma Center of Excellence for Desert Agriculture hosted an Automated Thinning and Weeding Technologies Field Day. The event featured twelve equipment vendors and university researchers showcasing and demoing the latest automated ag technologies in the field. Company representatives were on hand to discuss the technologies and answer questions. Since then, there has been a tremendous amount of innovation and development in these technologies. Several start-up companies have introduced new machinery into the marketplace and the older technologies have advanced greatly. We haven’t set a firm date yet but are planning for mid-October. The event is open to all companies and researchers that would like to show their automated thinning and/or weeding technology. If you are interested in demoing your equipment or know someone that is, please contact me. Stay tuned! 

Fig. 1. Highlight video of 1^st Automated Thinning and Weeding Technologies Field Demo (2018).

 

It is much easier to kill weeds when there is no crop in the field and now is a good time to reduce the weed seed bank of weeds in fallow fields. It is an especially valuable time to reduce the population of perennial weeds, like nutsedge, that will continue to get worse every year until the field is almost unfarmable for many crops. Weed seeds are buried at variable depths in the soil, some have hard seed coats and there are other variables that cause them to germinate over a long period of time. If they all came up at the same time they would be much easier to control. It takes time, therefore, to repeatedly irrigate, germinate and kill weeds with either tillage or herbicides. We have conducted trials that indicate that in most years summer annual weeds begin to germinate in February, reach a peak in June but continue to germinate into October. Perennial weeds often have to be actively growing to be adequately controlled and now is a good time to get started. 
 Tillage Repeated germination and tillage of small annual weeds can be very effective at reducing the weed seed bank. It can also spread weeds in some situations. Proper timing of tillage to kill weeds can be important with some species. Succulent weeds like purslane can survive for several days after cultivation or hoeing. They can reroot at the nodes and continue to grow if they are allowed to get too big before they are uprooted. Growers sometimes allow early emerging weeds to get fairly big in an effort to germinate as many seeds as possible. Incorporating big weeds can temporarily build up large amounts of organic matter into the soil and have a negative effect on some preemergent herbicides used in vegetables. Many of the root and shoot inhibitor herbicides like Trifluaralin, Pendimethalin, Benefin, DCPA and others can bind to organic matter and be less available to kill weeds.
Tillage has the opposite effect on perennial weeds such as nutsedge and bermudagrass than it has on annual weeds. These weeds are spread vegetatively and repeatedly irrigating and tilling them will spread rather than kill them.
 Herbicides Both contact and systemic herbicides are used during fallow periods to control weeds. The contact herbicides include Paraquat (Gramoxone, Firestorm), Carfentrazone (Aim, Shark), Pyraflufen (ET), Pelegonic Acid (Scythe) and others. Some of the advantages of these are that they are quick and have no soil residual allowing crops to be planted soon after application. Disadvantages are that they are effective primarily only on small weeds. The highest labelled rates of Paraquat is effective, however, on some big weeds.
The most commonly used systemic herbicide for fallow ground is Glyphosate. Timing is especially important when using glyphosate to control perennial weeds. Glyphosate moves both up and down from the foliage through plants. More of it moves down into the reproductive parts of perennial weeds late in the season. Late season applications will work better on perennial weeds.  It is broad spectrum and has no soil residual except on very course soils. Many of the systemic herbicides registered for fallow use, such as Oxyfluorfen (Goal, Galigen) or EPTC (Eptam) require at least 90 days before planting many vegetable crops. If done correctly, Eptam can be very effective in controlling nutsedge during summer fallow. It is sensitive to use for fallow weed control and application procedure is important. Eptam is extremely volatile and can be leached or evaporated when it contacts water. It works best when incorporated into dry soil to create a chemical tarp in the top 2 to 6 inches. The best technique is to irrigate and cultivate or spray the weeds with glyphosate when dry. One half gallon of Eptam should the be incorporated into the dry surface and left smooth. Avoid getting the field wet. The longer it can be left the better. Preferably at least 30 days. Longer if possible. Some people have chemigated the Eptam on and had fair control. I am surprised that this works but higher rates than 0.5 gallon have been used which my offset much of what is lost in the water. A couple good irrigations will be necessary to remove the residual Eptam when it get warmer and before planting vegetables 
Only the fumigants kill weed seeds. These include Chloropicrin, Methyl Bromide, Metam Sodium, Dazomet, Telone and others. Most preemergent herbicides only work after the seed has germinated. Preemergent herbicides are often used for fallow weed control only when at least 30 -45 days or longer are available. Fumigants are expensive, can be difficult to use and are often used for disease or nematode control with the added benefit of controlling weeds.
Soil solarization and flooding have become increasingly popular in recent years as techniques to control pests during summer fallow. Few regions are as well suited for these techniques as the low desert. They are used primarily to control diseases but have the benefit of controlling some summer annual weeds as well.

Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.
Area wide Insect Trapping Network   VegIPM Update, Vol. 14, No.6, Mar 22, 2023
 
Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.
 
Corn earworm:           

CEW moth counts increased in some trap locations this week (Tacna, Roll, Dome Valley, North Gila) and average for this time of year. 
 
Beet armyworm:          
Trap counts increased over the past 2 weeks, particularly in Tacana; average compared to previous years.
 
Cabbage looper:          
Cabbage looper counts decreased slightly in most traps and below average for this time of season.
 
Diamondback moth:    
DBM moths remained low in most areas and well below average for this time of the year.
 
Whitefly:                       
Adult movement was negligible and typical for this time of year. 
 
Thrips:                          
Thrips adult counts increased slightly in Tacna over the past 2 weeks. Currently, well below average compared with previous years.
 
Aphids:                        
Aphid movement increased in many locations (Gila, Dome and Yuma Valleys), and above average activity for mid-March.
 
Leafminers:                  
Adult activity up in some locations, and below average for late-February.