With the desert produce season almost completed and the spring melon season beginning, now is a good time to review the insecticide chemistries commonly used in your insect management programs. This is an important consideration as you make the transition from winter produce to alfalfa, spring melons and summer cotton where many of the same insecticide products are available in all these commodities.  Sustaining long-term insecticide efficacy that provides cost-effective crop protection requires a conscious effort on the part of PCAs and growers to use insecticides responsibly.  Over the past 30 years, Agrochemical Manufacturers have developed and brought to market over 20 new classes of chemistry that are highly effective, selective, and significantly safer than their chemical predecessors. These include the neonicotinoids, spinosyns, tetramic acid derivatives and anthranilic diamides to name a few.  Most recently, we have seen new feeding disruptor products, PQZ (pyrifluquinazon) and Versys/Sefina (afidopyropen) being applied to fall melons for virus management and in winter vegetables for aphid management. Although, the development of new insecticide chemistries has been a bit slow over the past few years, we’re now seeing industry beginning to develop several new experimental insecticides for desert crops. You’ll be pleased to know that several compounds are being targeted for western flower thrips. Of course, at best many of these products are a few years away from registration. But this is great news as many of the older products are slowly being phased out of the marketplace. It was just a couple of years ago that flubendiamide (Belt, Vetica) was removed from the market, chlorpyrifos (Lorsban) is now gone, and EPA is currently proposing label changes to the neonicotinoids which could impact their use on many important crops. Thus, it is imperative to sustain the efficacy of the newer insecticide tools currently available and Insecticide Resistance Management (IRM) is now more important than ever. The most fundamental approach to IRM is to minimize the selection of resistance by a pest to any one type of insecticide chemistry. The key to sustaining insecticide susceptibility is to avoid exposure of successive generations of an insect pest population to the same MOA. Historically, alternating, or rotating compounds with different modes of action (MOA) each time you spray has provided sustainable and effective IRM in our desert cropping systems.  When it is comes to IRM; “rotation, rotation, rotation”. In other words, never expose a generation of insects to the same MOA more than twice.  The Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC), a coordinated crop protection industry group, was formed to develop guidelines to delay or prevent resistance. Using their most recent information we have produced a brief publication which provides the latest local information on the modes of actions, routes of activity and pest spectrum for important insecticide chemistries used in desert produce and melon crops - see the attached Insecticide Modes of Action on Desert Produce Crops. This classification list will provide you with an additional set of guidelines for the selection of insecticides that can be used in desert IPM programs.

This is the second time we ae publishing the article in the newsletter this season. The reason being more and more fields showing symptom of the disease. In early season the disease is more of a concern in the greenhouse, and later in the season we see the disease in the field. Black rot is a disease in cole crops caused by bacterium, Xanthomonas campestris pv. Campestris.
 The pathogen can enter the field on transplants or seeds, and can stay in the soil for over a year where it survives on debris and weeds in the Brassicaceae family. The bacteria move primarily with water and can enter the plant through pores naturally present on the leaf surface. It can also be spread by workers and equipment moving through the field/greenhouse, and can enter the leaves through damage caused by wind, insects and other mechanical injuries. The bacteria need a temperature of 77 degrees and above. While it may seem like the weather in desert is not humid enough for bacteria to become an epidemic, it is not something that should be ignored. The microclimate in the field with the crop canopy being dense, foggy mornings, increased field activity can be conducible for disease development. 
Disease management include getting rid of infected plants/tissue, increasing distance between fields and choosing well-drained, controlling weeds especially in mustard family such shepherd’s purse, wild mustard, pepper weed etc.  Soil fumigation is effective but may not be economically feasible. Best management practice starts with disease-free seed; hot water treatment can reduce the likelihood that the bacteria will enter the field through the seed. Starting with healthy transplant is equally important. For diagnosis, you can bring the samples to the clinic or you can also do visual/field diagnosos. You will see patches of dead tissue in plants with blackened veins. Usually when the disease is systemic, you can see the black streak when you cut crosss section of the stem (see picture below).

In several previous articles (Vol. 11 (13), Vol. 11 (20), Vol. 11 (24), Vol. 12 (5), Vol 12 (12)), I’ve discussed using band-steam to control pests. Band-steam is where steam is used to heat narrow strips of soil to levels sufficient to kill soilborne pathogens and weeds (>140 °F for > 20 minutes). The concept has shown promise (see previous articles) and we are continuing to examine the technique to confirm previous results and assess its efficacy for controlling additional pests.

Over the course of the last several weeks, we established five trials, two in in Yuma, AZ and three in Salinas, CA. In Yuma, AZ, we are assessing control of weeds and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lactucae, the pathogen which causes Fusarium wilt of lettuce in romaine and iceberg lettuce. In Salinas, CA, we are examining control of weeds and cavity spot (Pythium spp.) in carrot, lettuce drop (Sclerotinia spp.) in romaine lettuce, and fusarium wilt of lettuce in iceberg lettuce (Fig.1).

Consistent with previous studies, early results from Yuma, AZ are showing treatment with steam heat is effective at controlling weeds (Fig. 2). Stay tuned for final trial results.
The band-steam applicator will be back in Yuma, AZ this fall for additional testing. If you are interested in evaluating band-steam on your farm, please contact me. We are seeking additional sites, particularly those with a known history of Fusarium wilt of lettuce disease incidence to test the efficacy and performance of the device.
As always, if you are interested in seeing the machine operate or would like more information, please feel free to contact me.

Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Crop Protection and Pest Management grant no. 2017-70006-27273/project accession no. 1014065 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, the Arizona Specialty Crop Block Grant Program, and the Arizona Iceberg Lettuce Research Council. We greatly appreciate their support. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
A special thank you is extended to Christensen & Giannini, LLC for allowing us to conduct research trials on their farm.

Fig. 1. Establishing band-steam trials in Salinas, CA to determine the efficacy of
using steam heat for controlling weeds and fusarium wilt of lettuce.



Fig. 2. Band-steam and untreated plots planted to lettuce (12 days after planting).

Weeds are a problem year after year even where they have been diligently controlled. A major reason for this is that weed seeds continually move into fields by irrigation water, wind, equipment, contaminated seed and other means. Controlling weeds on irrigation ditch banks can greatly help to reduce weed seed movement into fields.
The EPA regards non-crop areas as those that are not dedicated to crop production. Although crops are not normally grown on irrigation ditch banks, these areas should not be managed as non-crop. Several very broad spectrum and long lasting herbicides are registered for non-crop areas which include roadsides, industrial sites, fence rows, around structures, railroads etc.. Irrigation ditch banks should be considered separately because of their proximity to crop fields and irrigation water and the potential for herbicide movement into sensitive areas.
It is important to read the label carefully and only use those products that are specifically allowed for use on ditch banks. Some products are restricted to drainage ditch banks or dry ditches. Some can be used only above the water line and some can only be used for non-irrigation ditch banks Because most ditches here are used for irrigation, this can be confusing. The definition of a ditch however, can include an open trench or natural channel. It can also include ditches that are not in use for long periods of time. Some labels specify how long this non-use period should be. Some herbicides that have been used on ditch banks in the past are now restricted from this use because of groundwater contamination or off target movement that has occasionally occurred. Do not assume that products that were used for ditch banks in the past can still be used. Even very old products like MSMA can no longer be used for irrigation or drainage ditches. The following summarizes how some of the more common products that have been used on ditches can be used although the product labels should be read for more complete directions. There are several broad spectrum herbicides that are registered for “Non-Crop” sites but that are retricted from use on irrigation ditches. These include Bromacil,Triclopyr,Imazapyr,Thiazapyr Flumioxyzin,Imazomox,Topamezone,Valpar and others.

Area wide Insect Trapping Network   VegIPM Update, Vol. 15, No. 21, Oct 16, 2024

Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.

Corn earworm: CEW moth counts increased in most traps; about average for early October.

Beet armyworm: Trap counts increased in most areas last week, and about average for early October.

Cabbage looper: Cabbage looper trap counts still most locations, below average for this time of the season.

Diamondback moth: Adult activity increasing, particularly in the Yuma and Dome Valleys.  Above average for this time of season.

Whitefly: Adult movement increasing Tacna, Dome Valley and Yuma Valley; overall about average for early October.

Thrips: Thrips adult movement picking up in all areas, overall activity above average.

Aphids: Winged aphids beginning to show up the north Yuma and Gila Valleys; about average for early October.

Leaf miners: Adult activity light in all areas, about average for this time of season