Flubendiamide The Arizona produce industry received some good news and some bad news recently. First, the bad news. Earlier this year, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a notice with the intent to cancel flubendiamide products (Belt SC and Vetica) due to potential risks to aquatic invertebrates. Bayer Crop Science was asked to voluntarily cancel all flubendiamide registrations, but subsequently rejected the EPA’s decision and requested a hearing from Agency’s Administrative Law Judge and Environmental Appeals Board (EAB). Unfortunately, the Appeals Board has upheld the earlier EPA decision to cancel the registration of flubendiamide. So, as of today, Belt and Vetica can no longer be sold by Bayer or Nichino in the U.S., but the EAB decided that it would allow distributors and retailers to continue to distribute and sell existing stocks of the two products remaining in inventory. Thus PCAs and growers can continue using remaining product in inventory. This final decision is unfortunate since both Belt and Vetica are important cost-effective alternatives for worm control in produce and melon crops. In fact, among the diamide chemistries, Belt and Vetica were the most commonly used products in fall lettuce. For more information, see this Flubendiamide EAB Decision.
Sulfoxaflor The good news is that it appears that sulfoxaflor (Sequoia) will soon be registered and available for use on our leafy vegetable and brassica crops this winter. As you may recall the EPA was forced to cancel the sulfoxaflor registration in Nov 2015 based on a court ruling that the agency did not have enough scientific data to sufficiently demonstrate that sulfoxaflor had no unreasonable adverse effects to honey bees. Since then, EPA has been re-evaluating the sulfoxaflor label amended by Dow Agrosciences that now reduces or eliminates exposure to pollinators, and is proposing to unconditionally grant a Section 3 registration for certain crops including leafy vegetables and brassicas. Unfortunately, citrus, cotton and cucurbits are not included in the proposed registration. EPA concluded that sulfoxaflor will likely replace applications of pesticides that are at a higher risk to humans and other non-target organisms (including pollinators) and delaying its registration would delay these benefits. Before the cancellation of sulfoxaflor, Sequoia was used extensively for aphid management on winter and spring produce. For more information on the proposed label go to Proposed Registration of Sulfoxaflor.
Alfalfa is a major crop grown in Yuma area as a cover crop before vegetable season. Generally expected to be a hardy and easy crop to grow, alfalfa production still can be affected by many pests and diseases. Root and crown rot in alfalfa is a common problem. The pathogen Phytopthora megasperma thrives on standing water, overwatered, and/or in soil that lacks good drainage.
The above ground symptoms typically consists of plant wilting, usually occurring quite suddenly, often followed by plant death. The roots turn tan-to-brown, sometimes turning black. Sometimes orange-to-reddish streaks can be observed in rotted roots. Occasionally, the symptoms can be seen in crowns too. Infected plants succumb to death, or grow at reduced rate thus being susceptible to other pests and diseases.
The causal organism survives in soil as mycelia in infected plant tissue or as thick-walled oospores. It also produces thin-walled sporangia that release motile zoospores in the presence of free water. So it is important to grow alfalfa in well drained soils. Adjust irrigation water in a way that there is no standing water for too long. If possible, install tailwater ditch to remove excess water. Plant resistant cultivars like Agate, Apollo if the problem persists in the field. Till the soil deeply to reduce wet soil pockets, level the land before planting.
If diagnosis is confusing, bring the samples to the Yuma Plant Health Clinic for proper diagnosis. Make sure to bring healthy looking plants, sick plant, plants in between etc. Remember, there is no such thing as too much plant tissue when it comes to submitting samples to the clinic!
Controlling Disease and Weeds with Band-Steam – Yuma Trials Show Good Promise
In previous articles (Vol. 11 (13), Vol. 11 (20), Vol. 11(24)), I’ve discussed using band-steam to control plant diseases and weeds. Band-steaming is where steam is used to heat narrow strips of soil to temperature levels sufficient to kill soilborne pathogens and weed seed (>140 °F for > 20 minutes). The concept is showing good promise. This past season, three trials were conducted examining the efficacy of using steam for disease and weed control in Yuma, AZ. In the studies, steam was applied in a 4-inch-wide by 2-inch-deep band of soil centered on the seedline using a prototype band-steam applicator (Fig.1). The band-steam applicator is principally comprised of a 35 BHP steam generator mounted on top of an elongated bed shaper. The apparatus applies steam via shank injection and from cone shaped ports on top of the bed shaper.
Trial results were very encouraging as the prototype applicator was able to raise soil temperatures to target levels (140°F for >20 minutes) at viable travels speeds of 0.75 mph. Steam provided better than 80% weed control and significantly lowered hand weeding time by more than 2 hours per acre (Table 1). Results also showed that Fusarium colony forming units (CFU) were reduced from 2,600 in the control to 155 in the 0.75 mph and 53 in the 0.5 mph treatments, respectively (a more than 15-fold reduction). A significant difference in Fusarium wilt of lettuce disease incidence was not found, however disease infection at the field site was low (< 2%) and differences were not expected. At 0.5 mph, fuel costs were calculated to be $238/acre which was considered reasonable and consistent with the values reported by Fennimore et al. (2014).
An unexpected finding was that plants in steam treated plots appeared to be healthier and more vigorous than untreated plots (Fig. 2). This trial is still in progress and it will be interesting to see if this improved early growth translates into increases in crop yield.
In summary, early trial results are showing good promise for use of band-steam as a non-herbicidal method of pest control. We plan on conducting further trials in this multi-year study. If you are interested in evaluating the device on your farm and being part of the study please contact me. We are particularly interested in fields with a known history of Fusarium wilt of lettuce and/or Sclerotinia lettuce drop that will be planted to iceberg or romaine lettuce.
As always, if you are interested in seeing the machine operate or would like more information, please feel free to contact me.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Crop Protection and Pest Management grant no. 2017-70006-27273/project accession no. 1014065 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, the Arizona Specialty Crop Block Grant Program and the Arizona Iceberg Lettuce Research Council. We greatly appreciate their support. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
A special thank you is extended to Mellon Farms for allowing us to conduct this research on their farm.
References
Fennimore, S.A., Martin, F.N., Miller, T.C., Broome, J.C., Dorn, N. and Greene, I. 2014. Evaluation of a mobile steam applicator for soil disinfestation in California strawberry. HortScience 49(12):1542-1549.
Click link below or picture to see the band-steam and co-product applicator in action!
Carryover of Vegetable Herbicides to Wheat Grown in Rotation
Almost all the herbicides used on lettuce, cole crops and melons have restrictions on how soon wheat can be planted in rotation after they have been used. Experience has demonstrated, however, that safe intervals can vary considerably based upon many factors and are almost always much longer than they need to be. The most important factors are rate applied, irrigation practices and tillage. For example, when Kerb used to be banded at 2 to 4 lbs. per acre after planting and incorporated with furrow irrigation, it was common to see treated strips across wheat fields which followed. This is uncommon now that lower rates are Chemigated. We still see some Balan injury at ends of fields or in overlaps especially when sudan is planted. Wheat it not very sensitive to Prefar and carryover injury is uncommon.