Bagrada bug pressure on desert cole crops appears to finally be letting up. Based on our trials here at YAC and reports from numerous PCAs in Coachella, Imperial, Blythe and Yuma, the adult numbers on new stands have been much lower in the past week. On older stands, the plants now appear to be growing "normally" and insecticide applications are providing longer residual (go to this link for early results of an efficacy trial). In other research trials, it appears that soil applied neonicotinoids are proving some relief against adults as well. Broccoli plants and cauliflower transplants that were treated with soil applications of imidacloprid (Admire, Alias, Nuprid, etc) or clothianidin (Belay) at planting are significantly larger than untreated plants at 30 days after wet date. Although treated plants (at cotyledon or transplant stages) took some damage at stand establishment, it seems that once the plants produced fully expanded leaves the soil insecticides began to provide protection from Bagrada bugs. However, the ultimate impact of the Bagrada bug infestations may not be evident until harvest when we can assess maturity and quality of the crops that were heavily attacked early in stand establishment.

Although bug numbers have declined, PCAs should still remain vigilant and scout fields thoroughly for the presence of adults, and signs of new feeding damage (tattoo like feeding scars) on cotyledons and young terminal leaves. Research here at YAC on Bagrada adult activity has suggested that adults appear to be most active and abundant on plants in fields during the warmer parts of the day (9:00 AM to 4:00 PM), and least abundant on the plants early in the morning (4:00 AM to 8:00 AM) (see this link for preliminary findings). Thus, the highest probability of finding Bagrada bug adults on plants would be during mid-day. This may also be the best time to apply insecticides as well.

Bacterial soft rot is caused by several types of bacteria, but primarily subspecies and pathovars of Erwinia caro-tovora and E. chrysanthemi. Other bacterial species that cause soft rot include Pseudomonas cichorii, P. marginalis, and P. viridiflava. They have a wide host range host range and includes genera from nearly all plant families

In lettuce fields, the symptoms are observed close to the harvest time. The tissue, mostly around inside the head of head lettuce softens and becomes mushy or watery. Slimy masses of bacteria and cellular debris frequently ooze out from cracks in the tissues. Decaying tissue, which may be opaque, white,

cream-colored, gray, brown, or black frequently gives off a characteristically putrid odor. The odor is caused by secondary invading bacteria that are growing in the decomposing tissues. The bacteria overwinter in infected fleshy tissues in storage, in the field, garden or greenhouse, in the soil (especially in the rhizosphere around the roots of many plants), and on contaminated tools, equipment, containers, and in certain insects. The bacteria enter primarily through wounds made during planting, cultivating, harvesting, grading, and packing and through freezing injuries, insect and hail wounds, growth cracks, and sunscald. They may also follow other disease-producing organisms. Uninjured tissues may become infected when the humidity approaches 100 percent or when free moisture is present. Rains, poorly drained or waterlogged soils, and warm temperatures favor infection in the field, as does high humidity in storage or transit.

The bacteria multiply rapidly by dividing in half every 20 to 60 minutes under ideal conditions at temperatures between 65° and 95° (18° and 35°C). Minimum temperatures for development is between 35° and 46°F (2° and 6°C); and maximum between 95° and 105°F (35° and 41°C. The bacteria are spread by direct contact, hands, tools and farm machinery, insects, running or splashing water, contaminated, water in washing vats, clothing, and decayed bits of tissue.

Management

Promptly and carefully destroy infected plants. Maintain well aerated field, avoid close planting and overhead irrigation. To minimize post-harvest losses, avoid mechanical injury after harvest, packing and shipping. Do not pack produce when wet. Store and ship produce at temperatures near 4°C (39°F).

Source: IPM.Illinois.edu

Vol. 12, Issue 7, Published 4/7/2021

Over the last several years, there has been a tremendous amount of research activity towards the development of autonomous agriculture vehicles. A quick internet search will reveal over 50 companies or university research groups working in this space. A question I get often from groups developing such platforms is “What is a good agricultural application for our lightweight “robot”?”. It’s a great question, and for Arizona vegetable production, it’s also one that I’m not sure I have a satisfying answer for.

The calls I get regarding autonomous robots are mostly related to automated weeding applications. Automated weeding machines are commercially available, but their adoption has been limited not because of labor costs for tractor operation, rather it is the lack of the development of a functional and cost-effective means for identifying and removing weeds.

For decades, researchers have been attempting to develop sensing systems that are able to reliably detect weeds. Techniques such as 2-D and 3-D color imaging, x-rays, hyperspectral sensing and artificial intelligence have been tried (Slaughter, 2014; Bender et al., 2020). The best performing systems provide about 96% accuracy, meaning that 4% of the crops plants are identified as weeds and would be destroyed by the weeder. For high value vegetable crops like lettuce with gross revenues of roughly $10,000 per acre, killing 4% of the crop equates to $400 per acre of losses. Economically, this does not make sense as hand weeding labor costs are typically $300 per acre or less. The other main issue is that current automated weeding technologies are not highly precise and provide only partial control. Our studies with these types of machines have shown that these systems remove only about 1/3^rd of the in-row weeds (Lati, et al., 2016) and a follow up hand weeding operation is often necessary. To be highly cost effective, elimination of the hand weeding step is needed.

In short, my recommendation to research groups asking about applications for autonomous robots is that their time and technical skills would best be served developing reliable crop/weed differentiation systems and a technique to remove a very high percentage of weeds.

References
Bender, A., Whelan, B. & Sukkarieh, S. 2020. A high‐resolution, multimodal data set for agricultural robotics: A Ladybird's‐eye view of Brassica. J. Field Robotics. 37(1): 73-96.

Lati, R.N, Siemens, M.C., Rachuy, J.S. & Fennimore, S.A. (2016). Intrarow Weed Removal in Broccoli and Transplanted Lettuce with an Intelligent Cultivator. Weed Technology, 30(3), 655-663.

Slaughter, D.C. The biological engineer: Sensing the difference between crops and weeds. Autonomous robotic weed control systems: A review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 61(2008): 63-78.

Malva (malva parviflora) is one of the oldest and most pervasive weeds that that we deal with here. It is also known as little mallow or cheeseweed and is in the same family as cotton, okra and hibiscus. It is often classified as a winter annual but survives all year in this region. It has a deep taproot and can grow in compacted clay or sand and in freezing conditions and high temperatures It provides a refuge for insects and diseases that can damage several crops.

Malva is easy to identify both as a seedling and mature plant. The seedlings are distinctively  heart shaped and the mature plant is broad and palm shaped. It is very vegetative and can grow to 6 ft.

The deep tap root of this weed makes it difficult to cut out after it is established. Its response to herbicides id somewhat unusual. It is very sensitive to contact herbicides that do not move into the plant. These include Goal, Sharpen Gramoxone , Rely,Aim and others. However, it is not sensitive to systemic herbicides like 2,4-D and Glyphosate. It reproduces from seed and can be controlled preemergence with many of the same preemergence herbicides used in cotton like Prowl or Treflan. The seed pods are wheel shaped which is where the name cheeseweed comes from. Each seed pod contains 10 to 12 seeds

Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.
 
Corn earworm:            
CEW moth increased the Dome Valley area last week, but areawide below average for early October.
 
Beet armyworm:         
Trap counts highest in Tacan, Wellton and Dome, but below average for early fall.
 
Cabbage looper:          
Cabbage looper numbers remained low consistent with late-September.
 
Diamondback moth:   
DBM moths beginning to appear in traps in Wellton/Dome Valley, trending on average for early fall..
 
Whitefly:                      
Adult movement down in the past week, above average for late-September. 
 
Thrips:                         
Thrips adult activity beginning to increase, and trending about average to previous years.
 
Aphids:                        
First winged adults captured for the season, consistent with heavy winds from W-NW last week. Can anticipate aphid flights to increase in the coming weeks.
 
Leafminers:                   
Adult activity tending downward in most locations, average for late-September.