Our annual Lettuce Crop Losses Workshop was recently held in April and the results of the surveys reveal some interesting trends in insecticide usage on desert head lettuce. In general, the most commonly used insecticides in fall and spring lettuce correspond directly to the key pests that typically occur during these growing periods. When compared by class of chemistry using the IRAC mode of action classification system, the pyrethroids, applied both as foliar sprays and chemigations, were by far the most commonly used insecticide class (Tables 1, 2 and 3). This makes sense because they are one of the few inexpensive, broad spectrum insecticides still available for effective control of beetles, crickets and plant bugs. Nonetheless, over the past few years pyrethroid usage has been steadily declining, as has usage of organophospahates, and carbamates where Lannate and Orthene continue to be the primary compounds used in desert lettuce. The spinosyns remain the second most commonly used class of insecticides, where greater than 90% of the lettuce acreage was treated with Radiant and Success in 2011-2012. Their activity against both lepidopterous larvae and thrips make them a good fit in desert lettuce. The third most commonly used class of chemistry in fall and spring lettuce are the neonicotinoids driven primarily by at-plant, soil uses for sucking insects. Estimates this season showed that PCAs used generic imidacloprid and Admire Pro on a larger percentage of acres this season compared to last year. Estimates of Diamide usage (Coragen, Voliam Xpress, Vetica) showed that PCAs applied more of this chemistry in 2011-2012 than the previous season, and estimates further suggest that growers are slowly beginning to incorporate at-planting, soil uses of Coragen into their programs. Ketoenol usage (Movento) on fall lettuce was down compared to 2010, but usage as an aphicide on spring lettuce remains about the same. From an IPM perspective, the industry has made great strides in minimizing environmental impacts in lettuce production by continuing to incorporate the newer insecticides into their insect management programs. And for the second season in a row, PCAs treated a greater percentage of their acreage with selective, reduced-risk products than with the broadly toxic, older chemistries (pyrethroids, organophosphates, carbamates). To view a summary of the estimated insecticide usage by chemical class, as well as the 15 most commonly used insecticides on head lettuce during the past two growing season, go to Insecticide Use in Arizona Head Lettuce.

This study was conducted at the JV farms at Gila Valley. Lettuce variety ‘Guapo’ was seeded, then sprinkler-irrigated to germinate seed on September 19, 2023, on double rows 12 in. apart on beds with 42 in. between bed centers.  Rest of the irrigation was supplied by furrow irrigation or rainfall. Treatments were replicated five times in a randomized complete block design. Each replicate plot consisted of 25 ft of bed, which contained two 25 ft rows of lettuce. Plants were thinned on October 9, 2023 at the 3-4 leaf stage to a 12-inch spacing. Treatment beds were separated by single nontreated beds. Treatments were applied by incorporating in soil before seeding or with a tractor-mounted boom sprayer that delivered 50 gal/acre at 100 psi to flat-fan nozzles spaced 12 in apart.

Month	Max	Min	Avg	Rain
September	100	71	86	0.71 in
October	93	61	77	0.00 in
November	80	51	65	0.08 in
December	71	44	57	0.82 in

 
Fusarium wilt (caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae ) rating was done in the field by observing the typical symptom of lettuce wilt. Confirmation was done by cutting the cross section of roots. Disease scoring/rating was done on December 6, 2023. 
 
The data in the table illustrate the degree of disease control obtained by application of the various treatments in this trial. The disease pressure was extremely high in 2023, and most treatments showed little or no control against the disease. The treatments that showed some activity were Bexfond, Cevya, Rhyme, and Serifel. Plant vigor was normal and phytotoxicity symptoms were not observed in any treatments in this trial.

The autonomous agricultural robot industry is an incredibly fast-moving space. Startups, established companies and academic researchers are continuously putting forth new ideas and products. It’s hard to keep up with. In November of 2020, Future Farming (Misset Publisher, BV, Doetinchem, Netherlands) published a Field Robots Catalogue that provides a comprehensive overview of the state of autonomous ag robots. The article provides brief summaries of 35 autonomous ag robots that are currently commercially available. Along with a brief paragraph about what each robot does, the article presents information about how many robots from a particular manufacturer are actively being used, the cost of the machine, and links to a video of the device in action. Most of the robots are for weed management in vegetable crops. Kill mechanisms range from spot spraying to mechanical weed removal to electrocution.  Several of the robots featured are applicable and relevant to Arizona vegetable production, and some are currently operating in the U.S. If you’re interested in ag robots and want to get up to date, this article is an excellent resource and quick read. The article can be found at the link provided below.

Title: Future Farming Field Robots Catalogue
https://misset.com/field-robots/field-robots/
Publisher: Misset Publisher, BV, Doetinchem, Netherlands.

Contact herbicides are those that only affect the part of the weed that they “contact” They don’t move into or affect any other part of a plant. They were the first herbicides used and surprisingly, they still are better at controlling some weeds than any other products that have been developed. They usually control only small weeds with good coverage although some of them will kill large malva , Purslane and some other difficult to kill weeds. Goal, Sharpen, Treevix and Gramoxone, which are all contacts, will kill malva and purslane while systemic herbicides like Glyphosate and 2,4-D, misses them. Maestro or Bucril (Bromoxynil), also an old contact, will kill swinecress while many systemics like the growth regulators ,miss it. Glufosinate( Liberty, Rely) is a contact that is very broad spectrum and kills more grasses and broadleaves than many systemic herbicides. These all work very fast and in this age of immediate gratification ,you don’t have to wait long.  Most have little soil residual activity (except Goal, Chateau and a couple others) Goal and Chateau are contacts but used mostly preemergence to the weeds. They “ contact” the weeds when they emerge at the surface. which is a benefit where double or triple cropping is common. Most( again except Goal) are not volatile but will cause pretty clear contact injury when the spray moves to sensitive crops. Paraquat was registered in 1959 and is still a very useful tool for desiccating plants. Many restrictions have been put on its use because of its toxicity to humans.  Most contact herbicides are non-selective and will injure most living plant tissue. They are used selectively with directed spray or timing. Adjuvants are often required to increase absorption, spreading and sticking.

Area wide Insect Trapping Network   VegIPM Update, Vol. 13 No. 12, Jun 15, 2022
Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.
 

Corn earworm:            
CEW moth counts increased significantly in the past 2 weeks, considerably higher than the previous 2 summers.
 
Beet armyworm:        
Trap counts remain active in some locations (Yuma Dome Valley and Tacna) but significantly lower than last summer
 
Cabbage looper:         
Cabbage looper numbers remain low consistent with the lack of activity this fall compared to last season.
 
Diamondback moth:     
 DBM counts very light and lower than previous 2 seasons.
 
Whitefly:                      
Adult movement continuing to increase rapidly, particularly in Dome valley and Yuma Valley consistent with melon harvest.
 
Thrips:                          
Thrips adult movement highest in Dome Valley, Tacna, and Gila Valley comparable to this time last year.
 
Aphids:                       
Aphid movement has been absent for the past month similar to what we typically observe in the summer. 
 
Leafminers:                  
Adult activity has highest in Gila Valley, and above average for mid-June.