Historically, our Areawide Pheromone and Sticky Trap monitoring for insects was terminated around the first of April as the produce season ended. Beginning 4 years ago however, we continued our Areawide Trapping Network throughout the summer to collect trapping data from all 15 areawide trap locations year-round. So why is this additional trapping data useful? For several reasons:
1) Understanding the activity of some of our key pests when produce is not grown during the summer may give us an indication of what to expect as the fall produce season begins. This may be particularly helpful for predicting moth flights and whitefly flights in August-September coinciding with early transplanting and direct seeded crops. Another example is keeping track of corn earworm which can unexpectedly show up near the beginning of fall harvests.
2) Trapping for pests during the summer has shown us that 2 of our more important produce pests are not caught in traps during the summer. We presume this is due to the absence of brassica crops and weeds for diamondback moth, and high daytime/nighttime temperatures lethal to aphids. The fact that trap catches resume in the fall supports our conclusion that these pests are absent in the summer, only to reenter the desert via winds and/or transplants in the fall. And finally,
3) It gives me something to do in the summer other than write reports and papers.
So, visit the Areawide Summer Trap Network if you’re curious what our key pests are up to.
Widely accepted definition of a living organism “A living organism has a cellular structure and is manifest by growth through metabolism, reproduction, and the power of adaptation to the environment through changes that originate internally”. Viruses are not cellular and do not metabolise, but they reproduce and adapt.
A virus is a set of one or more nucleic acid template molecules, normally incased in a protective coats of protein or lipoprotein and is able to organize its own replication but only within a suitable host cells. Record of plant viruses do not go as far as human viruses, but plant viruses have caused considerable loss in agriculture system.
One of the most common virus we see in agriculture system in todays world is Cucumber mosaic virus(CMV). CMV belongs to family Bromoviridae. The genome size of cucumber mosaic virus (see pic) is about 8000 to 9000 nucletotide bases (1 base=1 letter of AGTC). The genome size of Covid19 Coronivirus is about 30,000 bases and the genome size of human DNA is 6.4 billion bases.
CMV has a very wide host range and is transmitted by aphids in nonpersistent manner (stylet borne). This means that the aphids acquire the virus particle in their stylet within seconds of feeding in infected plants, hop on to next plant and start feeding on next plant. The virus is transmitted to the next plant immediately.
Next is incubation period. Viruses cause systemic infection. It can take anywhere from few days to few weeks from initial entry of the virus to symptom exhibition in your plants. The severity of symptoms varies depending on many factors. The age of plant (infection stage), the general plant vigor (health), varietal susceptibility, conducive environment (viruses express better in colder weather than hot weather), a plant that has already been infected with other viruses (preesisting condition) are to name a few.
Attachment – the virus attaches itself to the outside of a new plant cell
Penetration – the protein pushes the nucleic acid strand into the plant cell
Replication – the viruses’ nucleic acid uses the plant cell DNA to make many new nucleic acid strands and protein sheathes
Assembly – the nucleic acid and protein assembly into millions of new virus copies
Release – the viruses leave the cell – at this stage the cell is normally dead and bursts releasing the viruses
Transmission – the viruses move using a vector to new cells to infect.
When you see the symptoms in your plants, the first thing you have to understand is virus infection is systemic. The best you can do to manage the virus is to limit the transmission (flatten the curve). Some viruses need a vector for transmission like insects and nematodes. Some viruses are mechanically transmitted from one infected plant to another. Washing field tools between plants/field whenever possible limits the transmission of virus. Soap, bleach, and disinfectants reduce transmission by protein denaturalization of the virus.
Controlling Disease and Weeds with Band-Steam – Yuma Trials Show Good Promise
In previous articles (Vol. 11 (13), Vol. 11 (20), Vol. 11(24)), I’ve discussed using band-steam to control plant diseases and weeds. Band-steaming is where steam is used to heat narrow strips of soil to temperature levels sufficient to kill soilborne pathogens and weed seed (>140 °F for > 20 minutes). The concept is showing good promise. This past season, three trials were conducted examining the efficacy of using steam for disease and weed control in Yuma, AZ. In the studies, steam was applied in a 4-inch-wide by 2-inch-deep band of soil centered on the seedline using a prototype band-steam applicator (Fig.1). The band-steam applicator is principally comprised of a 35 BHP steam generator mounted on top of an elongated bed shaper. The apparatus applies steam via shank injection and from cone shaped ports on top of the bed shaper.
Trial results were very encouraging as the prototype applicator was able to raise soil temperatures to target levels (140°F for >20 minutes) at viable travels speeds of 0.75 mph. Steam provided better than 80% weed control and significantly lowered hand weeding time by more than 2 hours per acre (Table 1). Results also showed that Fusarium colony forming units (CFU) were reduced from 2,600 in the control to 155 in the 0.75 mph and 53 in the 0.5 mph treatments, respectively (a more than 15-fold reduction). A significant difference in Fusarium wilt of lettuce disease incidence was not found, however disease infection at the field site was low (< 2%) and differences were not expected. At 0.5 mph, fuel costs were calculated to be $238/acre which was considered reasonable and consistent with the values reported by Fennimore et al. (2014).
An unexpected finding was that plants in steam treated plots appeared to be healthier and more vigorous than untreated plots (Fig. 2). This trial is still in progress and it will be interesting to see if this improved early growth translates into increases in crop yield.
In summary, early trial results are showing good promise for use of band-steam as a non-herbicidal method of pest control. We plan on conducting further trials in this multi-year study. If you are interested in evaluating the device on your farm and being part of the study please contact me. We are particularly interested in fields with a known history of Fusarium wilt of lettuce and/or Sclerotinia lettuce drop that will be planted to iceberg or romaine lettuce.
As always, if you are interested in seeing the machine operate or would like more information, please feel free to contact me.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Crop Protection and Pest Management grant no. 2017-70006-27273/project accession no. 1014065 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, the Arizona Specialty Crop Block Grant Program and the Arizona Iceberg Lettuce Research Council. We greatly appreciate their support. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
A special thank you is extended to Mellon Farms for allowing us to conduct this research on their farm.
References
Fennimore, S.A., Martin, F.N., Miller, T.C., Broome, J.C., Dorn, N. and Greene, I. 2014. Evaluation of a mobile steam applicator for soil disinfestation in California strawberry. HortScience 49(12):1542-1549.
Click link below or picture to see the band-steam and co-product applicator in action!
Contact herbicides are those that only affect the part of the weed that they “contact” They don’t move into or affect any other part of a plant. They were the first herbicides used and surprisingly, they still are better at controlling some weeds than any other products that have been developed. They usually control only small weeds with good coverage although some of them will kill large malva , Purslane and some other difficult to kill weeds. Goal, Sharpen, Treevix and Gramoxone, which are all contacts, will kill malva and purslane while systemic herbicides like Glyphosate and 2,4-D, misses them. Maestro or Bucril (Bromoxynil), also an old contact, will kill swinecress while many systemics like the growth regulators ,miss it. Glufosinate( Liberty, Rely) is a contact that is very broad spectrum and kills more grasses and broadleaves than many systemic herbicides. These all work very fast and in this age of immediate gratification ,you don’t have to wait long. Most have little soil residual activity (except Goal, Chateau and a couple others) Goal and Chateau are contacts but used mostly preemergence to the weeds. They “ contact” the weeds when they emerge at the surface. which is a benefit where double or triple cropping is common. Most( again except Goal) are not volatile but will cause pretty clear contact injury when the spray moves to sensitive crops. Paraquat was registered in 1959 and is still a very useful tool for desiccating plants. Many restrictions have been put on its use because of its toxicity to humans. Most contact herbicides are non-selective and will injure most living plant tissue. They are used selectively with directed spray or timing. Adjuvants are often required to increase absorption, spreading and sticking.
