Areawide Diamondback Moth Trapping Network Established in Yuma
In response to the recent outbreaks of Diamondback moth (DBM) , Plutella xylostella in Yuma, we have established a pheromone trap network designed to monitor the activity and movement of adult populations of DBM. PCAs have had difficulty controlling DBM in cabbage, broccoli and cauliflower since October. Wing Traps with DBM pheromone lures have been placed in Roll, Wellton, Dome Valley, Gila Valley and Yuma Valley in locations where Cole crops are presently being grown, or in areas where infestations were known to occur this fall. The data we collect is not intended to indicate field infestations, as trap data is largely a reflection of adult movement. The data may reflect emergence/ activity of adults in adjacent fields with known infestations, or provide an indication that DBM may be moving into fields not previously infested. If nothing else, the data may make PCAs aware of increased pest activity in some areas and encourage intensified scouting in susceptible produce fields. DBM are still active in many fields, and most recently we’ve observed that populations are beginning to spread into direct-seeded crops that were not previously effected by DBM. For this reason, we are tracking moth activity to monitor their activity relative weather conditions and crops sources. We have a historical perspective of DBM activity in Yuma. From 1998-2000, we established a pheromone trap network during the winter and spring in Yuma which included DBM. Not surprisingly during that 2-year trapping period DBM counts never exceed 6 moths/trap/day at any time during the spring season. DBM have historically been a secondary pest, that may cause issues in spring cabbage crops. However, in just the few weeks we’ve been trapping DBM since Dec 20, we’ve had four trap locations where DBM counts have exceeded 10 moths/trap/day and in one location (Co. 9th and Ave F) over 25 moths /day were recorded. These traps were all located in the Yuma Valley, stretching from Co. 21st up to Co. 9th street. We will continue to monitor DBM trap activity throughout the season, as well as trap population activity throughout the summer to determine whether DBM is active when brassica crops are not available. This may give us an indication of the potential for more problems going into next season. From a historical perspective, trap counts during the summer of 1999 in the Yuma Valley occasionally caught DBM moths in traps at low levels (0.2-1.2 moths/trap/night from July-August). We concluded at that time that many of the DBM captured may have come in with transplants, as we were uncertain whether DBM was capable of over summering in the desert in the absence of brassica crops. We hope to gain more insight into the pest’s activity during summer months in Yuma this year by actively trapping throughout the area. For access to DBM trap counts please visit Areawide Diamondback Moth Trapping Network.
This study was conducted at the Yuma Valley Agricultural Center. The soil was a silty clay loam (7-56-37 sand-silt-clay, pH 7.2, O.M. 0.7%). Spinach ‘Revere’ was seeded, then sprinkler-irrigated to germinate seed Jan 18, 2024 on beds with 84 in. between bed centers and containing 30 lines of seed per bed. All irrigation water was supplied by sprinkler irrigation. Treatments were replicated four times in a randomized complete block design. Replicate plots consisted of 15 ft lengths of bed separated by 3 ft lengths of nontreated bed. Treatments were applied with a CO2backpack sprayer that delivered 50 gal/acre at 40 psi to flat-fan nozzles.
Month
Max
Min
Average
Rainfall
January
68
42
54
1.14 in
February
73
47
59
0.50 in
March
77
50
63
0.31 in
Downy mildew (caused by Peronospora farinosa f. sp. spinaciae) was first observed in plots on Feb 19 and final reading was taken on February 26, 2024. Spray date for each treatments are listed in excel file with the results. Disease severity was recorded by determining the percentage of infected leaves present within three 1-ft2 areas within each of the four replicate plots per treatment. The number of spinach leaves in a 1-ft2 area of bed was approximately 144.
The data (found in the accompanying Excel file) illustrate the degree of disease reduction obtained by applications of the various tested fungicides. Products that provided effective control against the disease include Orondis ultra, Thrive 4 M, Fungout, Cevya, Eject and Zampro. No phytotoxicity was observed in any of the treatments in this trial.
Controlling Fusarium Wilt of Lettuce Using Steam Heat – Trial Initiated
Earlier this week, we initiated a trial examining the use of band steam for controlling Fusarium wilt of lettuce. The premise behind this research is to use steam heat to raise soil temperatures to levels sufficient to kill soilborne pathogens. For Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae, the pathogen which causes Fusarium wilt of lettuce, the required temperature for control is generally taken to be > 140°F for 20 minutes. Soil solarization, where clear plastic is placed over the crop bed during the summer, exploits this concept. The technique raises soil surface temperatures to 150-155˚F, effectively killing the pathogen and reducing disease incidence by 45-98% (Matheron and Porchas, 2010).
In our trials, we are using steam heat to raise soil temperatures. Steam is delivered by a 35 BHP steam generator mounted on a custom designed elongated bed shaper (Fig. 1). Preliminary results were encouraging. The device was able to increase the temperature of the top 3” of soil to over 180°F at a travel speed of 0.5 mph as shown in this video of the machine in action (shown below). These temperatures exceed that of those known to control pathogens responsible for causing Fusarium wilt of lettuce (> 140°F for 20 minutes).
Stay tuned for final trial results and reports on the efficacy of using steam heat to control Fusarium wilt of lettuce.
If you are interested in evaluating the technique on your farm, please contact me. We are seeking additional sites with a known history of Fusarium wilt of lettuce disease incidence to test the efficacy and performance of the device.
References
Matheron, M. E., & Porchas, M. 2010. Evaluation of soil solarization and flooding as management tools for Fusarium wilt of lettuce. Plant Dis. 94:1323-1328.
Acknowledgements
This project is sponsored by USDA-NIFA, the Arizona Specialty Crop Block Grant Program and the Arizona Iceberg Lettuce Research Council. We greatly appreciate their support.
A special thank you is extended to Cory Mellon and Mellon Farms for allowing us to conduct this research on their farm.
Weeds are one of the most visible of all agricultural pests. They can’t move or hide and once established often stick up over the crop. Just one weed in a 10 acre field is annoying to look at. With insects and diseases, the damage is often more visible than the pest. That is not the case with weeds. A moderate weed infestation is approximately 10 weeds per square foot. If a herbicide produces 90% control, that leaves 1 weed per square foot or 43 weeds per acre. Without an untreated check, this can look like the herbicide failed! It is easy to leave an untreated spot in a field and it is well worth doing. Many applicators do so unintentionally because of skips, powerlines and other causes. They help determine crop injury and weed control. Here are some examples of what various levels of control looked like from one of our cole crop trials:
To contact John Palumbo go to: jpalumbo@ag.Arizona.edu
