Hope you are all enjoying the summer so far and keeping busy. Although, we’re about 2 months away from the Fall produce season, it’s never too early to begin thinking of IPM strategies you will be using to battle key insects next season. This includes keeping track of their typical activity during June, July, and August. Below is a short discussion detailing individual pests. 
 
Aphids:    The major aphid species that are important in produce crops each spring include green peach aphid, foxglove aphid and lettuce aphid.  These species are considered cool season pests and are biologically most active during the winter and spring when temperature average around (55-65 F). We do not find them on summer crops as the high temperatures prohibit their activity. They essentially become extinct each summer only to reappear in the fall to infest crops in Oct-Dec migrating into the desert via N-NW winds that occur after the monsoons.
 
Diamondback Moth (DBM):  Another key pest that disappears each summer but for a different reason than for aphids. The host range of DBM is limited to only brassica crop and plants. Although brassica weeds are common during the winter, they occur during the summer due to high temperatures and dry conditions. Thus, like aphids, DBM populations from the previous spring season become “extinct” during the summer when brassica crops and weeds are absent. They reappear each fall migrating in on high winds associated with tropical storms from Mexico, or arrive into the region on infested brassica transplants from California.
 
Whiteflies:       A resident pest that occurs year-round in the desert. As a warm season pest, whiteflies are most abundant on fall produce crops, and seldom a problem during the winter and spring. Peak abundance occurs during the summer months on cotton, and again in September and October on fall brassica, leafy vegetables and fall melons.  Thus, it is important to control whiteflies in cotton prior to defoliation to prevent large migrations onto fall produce crops. In addition, whiteflies can be found on several weeds such as purslane, goosefoot, ground cherry, and sunflowers. Sanitation in and around fields being prepped for fall plantings is important. Preventatively, growers should consider applying soil, system insecticides such as imidacloprid or Verimark to Fall produce crops.

Beet Armyworm (BAW):  A warm-season pest that occurs year-round in the desert. They tend to reach peak abundance twice a year. Generally, the most important peak is in September and October when weather is ideal for their development, flight activity and oviposition. A second peak occurs in late spring. Activity is generally light during the summer, occurring primarily in alfalfa crops. Although BAW is known to migrate in from the south via monsoon and tropical storms, resident populations annually occur in alfalfa during the summer. Thus, to minimize BAW in fall produce crops, thorough management of BAW can potentially minimize their movement onto Fall produce crops.  Weeds are also a source of BAW (purslane, goosefoot, sunflower and Russian thistle) so sanitation in and around fields is important.
 
Western Flower Thrips (WFT):  Also a resident pest that can be found in the desert year round. WFT is most abundant on lettuce in the late spring, but peaks in abundance on alfalfa, melons and cotton is May and June. During the late summer numbers drop dramatically where thrips can be found on melons and alfalfa and weeds like goosefoot and purslane. WFT slowly move into lettuce again in early fall and are least abundant during the winter.  Sanitation of weeds during the summer can help reduce thrips abundance moving into the fall crops and weeds.
 
For more information see:   Keeping Track of Major Produce Pests During the Summer

This study was conducted at the Yuma Valley Agricultural Center. The soil was a silty clay loam (7-56-37 sand-silt-clay, pH 7.2, O.M. 0.7%). Variety: Deluxe (HMX2595) was seeded, then sprinkler-irrigated to germinate seed on March 20, 2024on 84 inches between bed centers. All other water was supplied by furrow irrigation or rainfall. Treatments were replicated five times in a randomized complete block design. Each replicate plot consisted of 25 ft of bed. Treatment beds were separated by single nontreated beds. Treatments were applied with a tractor-mounted boom sprayer that delivered 50 gal/acre at 100 psi to flat-fan nozzles spaced 12 in apart. 

Spray treatments were done on 05-21-2024, 05-31-2024, 06-07-2024 and 06-14-24. Powdery mildew was first seen on 06-05-24. Please see excel file for additional details.  

Disease severity of powdery mildew (caused by Sphaerotheca fuliginea and S. fusca) severity was determined 6-17-2024 by rating 10 plants within each of the four replicate plots per treatment using the following rating system: 0 = no powdery mildew present; 1 = one to two mildew colonies on leaves  ;2 = powdery mildew present on one quarter of leaves; 3 = powdery mildew present on half of the leaves; 4 = powdery mildew present on more than half of leaf surface area ; 5 = powdery mildew present on entire leaf. These ratings were transformed to percentage of leaves infected values before being statistically analyzed.

The data in the table illustrate the degree of disease control obtained by application of the various treatments in this trial. Most treatments significantly reduced the final severity of powdery mildew compared to nontreated plants. Quintec, Merivon, Tesaris, Luna Sensation, and V6M-5-14 V gave the best disease control. Phytotoxicity symptoms were not noted for any treatments in this trial.

ANR Webinar 10/17 click link for details.

Vegetable season is rapidly approaching, and it won’t be long before established stands of lettuce are ready to be thinned. Since their commercialization about 8 years ago, use automated lettuce thinning machines has become a common practice in the Yuma area. These machines intermittently spray solutions of herbicide or fertilizer in the plant row to kill excess seedlings. A question growers might have is whether or not automated lettuce thinning is also effective at controlling in-row weeds. Research studies have shown it is. 

In trials conducted in 2014 and 2015, Mosqueda et al. (2017) compared the performance of four different automated thinning machines with hand thinning. Eight commercial field sites near Salinas, CA were utilized in the study. Results showed that automated thinning and hand thinning removed 68% and 73% of the weeds respectively (percentage data provided in Smith, 2015). The differences were not statistically significant, implying that automated thinning was as effective at in-row weed removal as compared to hand thinning. 

It’s interesting to note that both thinning methods controlled essentially all in-row weeds except those close to the “keeper” crop plant. To make this conclusion, one can estimate the percentage of the seed line that was sprayed or hoed by using the target plant spacing of 11” and assuming that a 1.5” safety/buffer distance was used on either side of the keeper crop plant. Given these parameters, the percentage of in-row area that was not sprayed or hoed out can be calculated as ((1.5 + 1.5)/11 x 100), or 27%. The sprayed or hoed out area is 100% minus this value, or 73%. This value compares very favorably to the 68-73% weed control efficacy found by Mosqueda et al. (2017). 

Automated thinner manufacturers offer an option where spray is also applied to the sides of the keeper plant relative to the direction of travel. The concept is to control as many weed as possible near the crop plant. An example of the spray pattern described is shown in Fig. 1. Given the demonstrated high efficacy of spray solutions used for automated thinning, this technique may be an option worth considering for the upcoming growing season as weeds close to the crop plant are the most difficult and time consuming to control.

 

References:
Mosqueda, E., Smith, R., Goorahoo, D. & Shrestha, A. Automated lettuce thinners reduce labor requirements and increase speed of thinning. California Agriculture, 72(2):114-119.

Smith, R. Impact of automated thinners on weeds and lettuce production. In Proc. 67th Annual California Weed Science Society 67: 44. Salinas, Calif.: California Weed Science Society.

We are always adjusting how we use herbicides to fit the unique conditions in this area. The herbicides that are registered for use on lettuce here are limited  and they all require a little different management. Environmental conditions, soil characteristics and  Chemical properties all can greatly affect how well the 3 preemergence  herbicides used in lettuce will work. These include Balan, Prefar and Kerb. Environmental conditions and  soil characteristic vary greatly from year to year and field to field. It is difficult to make general recommendations on how best to use these three herbicides because of this. Chemical characteristics do not vary, however, and we can make some generalizations on how they should be used.

We use a lot of water here during stand establishment and at this time of year.  The water solubility of Balan, Prefar and Kerb vary widely and should be considered when deciding how to use them. Water solubility is the amount of the herbicide that will dissolve in water. This is usually given as PPM or mg/liter. The higher the number the more soluble it is. Solubility will effect leaching into the soil and runoff. The solubility of Balan is 0.1 PPM,Prefar is 5.6 PPM and Kerb is 15 PPM. What this means is that Balan is very insoluble and has to be mechanically incorporated. Prefar is 56 times more soluble than Balan and can be incorporated with overhead water but this is still not a very soluble herbicide and a lot of water is needed. Kerb is 150 times more soluble than Balan and almost 3 times more soluble than Prefar. Kerb will leach and the amount of overhead water applied must be carefully managed.

Area wide Insect Trapping Network   VegIPM Update, Vol. 15, No. 7, Apr 3, 2024
 
Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches can be viewed here.
 
Corn earworm:            
CEW moth counts remain  at low levels  in all areas, well below average for this time of year. 
 
Beet armyworm:          
Trap increased areawide; about average compared to previous years.
 
Cabbage looper:           
Cabbage looper counts increased to seasonal highs; above average for this time of season.
 
Diamondback moth:       
DBM moth counts increased in most areas. About average for this time of the year.
 
Whitefly:                      
Adult movement negligible, average for late winter. 
 
Thrips:                          
Thrips adult counts increased in most areas. Below average compared with previous years.
 
Aphids:                         
Aphid movement decreased in all areas; below average for late-March.
 
Leafminers:                   
Adults remain low in most locations, average for March.