Proposed EPA Labels Changes Could Impact Desert Crops 2015
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently proposed additional mandatory pesticide label restrictions that would prohibit the application of acutely toxic pesticides during the time crops are in bloom and commercial bees have been placed in or near fields for pollination services. If these proposed label changes are implemented they could have important implications for managing key pests on desert crops which require the use of contracted bees for pollination. Specifically, the proposed labelling reads as follows: “Foliar application of this product is prohibited from onset of flowering until flowering is complete when bees are on-site under contract”. This label would apply to pesticides that have an acute contact toxicity value less than 11 micrograms per bee (LD50<11 μg/bee). Unfortunately for desert producers, the list of acutely toxic insecticides includes all of the pyrethroid, organophosphate, carbamate and neonicotinoid insecticide active ingredients currently used for control of major pests. Also included in this list are Exirel, Radiant, Success, Sequoia, Abamectin, Proclaim, Avaunt and Torac. Even insecticides approved for organic production are not exempt, as azadirachtin (e.g., Aza-Direct), pyethrins (e.g., Pyganic), spinosad (Entrust) and rotenone are also on the restricted list. The full description of the proposed label changes, including the list of acutely toxic pesticides (Appendix A) affected and proposed label language (Appendix B), can be found here: EPA’s Proposal to Mitigate Exposure to Bees from Acutely Toxic Pesticide Products In my view, fall melons would be most directly affected by this proposed label change. Economic production of fall melons requires pollination services, but of course also requires adult whitefly control during the bloom/pollination period to suppress the spread of virus (CYSDV). Based on EPAs proposed label restrictions, application of industry standards like Assail, bifenthrin, fenpropathrin, and Exirel would not be allowed anytime, day or night, on fall melons as long as commercial bee hives are present. This could make whitefly/CYSDV control during bloom very difficult. UA research has clearly shown that the remaining alternatives labeled for whitefly control not on EPAs proposed list (i.e., Knack, Vetica, Oberon, Coragen, Fulfill, Beleaf) have little effect on preventing virus infection. Under this scenario, spread of CYSDV in some fields could essentially go unchecked for several weeks. If you are interested in voicing your opinion on this new proposal, EPA is currently accepting public comments until July 29, 2015. For more information on how to submit comments go to: http://www2.epa.gov/pollinator-protection/proposal-protect-bees-acutely-toxic-pesticides and http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0818.
2023-2024 Powdery Mildew of Lettuce Fungicide Trial
This study was conducted at the Yuma Valley Agricultural Center. The soil was a silty clay loam (7-56-37 sand-silt-clay, pH 7.2, O.M. 0.7%). Lettuce was seeded, then sprinkler-irrigated to germinate seed on Nov 28, 2023 on double rows 12 in. apart on beds with 42 in. between bed centers. All other water was supplied by furrow irrigation or rainfall. Treatments were replicated five times in a randomized complete block design. Each replicate plot consisted of 25 ft of bed, which contained two 25 ft rows of lettuce. Plants were thinned Jan 17, 2024 at the 3-4 leaf stage to a 12-inch spacing. Treatment beds were separated by single nontreated beds. Treatments were applied with a tractor-mounted boom sprayer that delivered 50 gal/acre at 100 psi to flat-fan nozzles spaced 12 in apart.
Month
Max Temp (°F)
Min Temp (°F)
Average Temp (°F)
Rainfall
November
80
51
65
0.08 in
December
71
44
57
0.82 in
January
68
42
54
1.14 in
February
73
47
59
0.50 in
Powdery mildew (caused by Golovinomyces cichoracearum) efficacy trial treatments were made on February 15,2024, February 23, 2024, March 4, 2024, and March 12, 2024and .Disease was first seen on February 26,2024. Disease rating was done on March 15, 2024. Disease severity was determined by rating 10 plants within each of the four replicate plots per treatment using the following rating system: 0 = no powdery mildew present; 0.5 = one to a few very small powdery mildew colonies on bottom leaves; 1 = powdery mildew present on bottom leaves of plant; 2 = powdery mildew present on bottom leaves and lower wrapper leaves; 3 = powdery mildew present on bottom leaves and all wrapper leaves; 4 = powdery mildew present on bottom leaves, wrapper leaves, and cap leaf; 5 = powdery mildew present on entire plant. These ratings were transformed to percentage of leaves infected values before being statistically analyzed. Yield loss due to rejected lettuce heads would likely begin to occur on plants with a powdery mildew rating above 2.0 (percentage of leaves infected value of 40).
The data in the table illustrate the degree of disease control obtained by application of the various treatments in this trial. Most treatments significantly reduced the final severity of powdery mildew compared to nontreated plants. The most effective fungicides were Rhyme, Merivon, Quintec, Cevya, Luna Sensation, Luna Experience, and Elisys.
Controlling Fusarium Wilt of Lettuce Using Steam Heat – Trial Initiated
Earlier this week, we initiated a trial examining the use of band steam for controlling Fusarium wilt of lettuce. The premise behind this research is to use steam heat to raise soil temperatures to levels sufficient to kill soilborne pathogens. For Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae, the pathogen which causes Fusarium wilt of lettuce, the required temperature for control is generally taken to be > 140°F for 20 minutes. Soil solarization, where clear plastic is placed over the crop bed during the summer, exploits this concept. The technique raises soil surface temperatures to 150-155˚F, effectively killing the pathogen and reducing disease incidence by 45-98% (Matheron and Porchas, 2010).
In our trials, we are using steam heat to raise soil temperatures. Steam is delivered by a 35 BHP steam generator mounted on a custom designed elongated bed shaper (Fig. 1). Preliminary results were encouraging. The device was able to increase the temperature of the top 3” of soil to over 180°F at a travel speed of 0.5 mph as shown in this video of the machine in action (shown below). These temperatures exceed that of those known to control pathogens responsible for causing Fusarium wilt of lettuce (> 140°F for 20 minutes).
Stay tuned for final trial results and reports on the efficacy of using steam heat to control Fusarium wilt of lettuce.
If you are interested in evaluating the technique on your farm, please contact me. We are seeking additional sites with a known history of Fusarium wilt of lettuce disease incidence to test the efficacy and performance of the device.
References
Matheron, M. E., & Porchas, M. 2010. Evaluation of soil solarization and flooding as management tools for Fusarium wilt of lettuce. Plant Dis. 94:1323-1328.
Acknowledgements
This project is sponsored by USDA-NIFA, the Arizona Specialty Crop Block Grant Program and the Arizona Iceberg Lettuce Research Council. We greatly appreciate their support.
A special thank you is extended to Cory Mellon and Mellon Farms for allowing us to conduct this research on their farm.
Weeds are one of the most visible of all agricultural pests. They can’t move or hide and once established often stick up over the crop. Just one weed in a 10 acre field is annoying to look at. With insects and diseases, the damage is often more visible than the pest. That is not the case with weeds. A moderate weed infestation is approximately 10 weeds per square foot. If a herbicide produces 90% control, that leaves 1 weed per square foot or 43 weeds per acre. Without an untreated check, this can look like the herbicide failed! It is easy to leave an untreated spot in a field and it is well worth doing. Many applicators do so unintentionally because of skips, powerlines and other causes. They help determine crop injury and weed control. Here are some examples of what various levels of control looked like from one of our cole crop trials:
To contact John Palumbo go to: jpalumbo@ag.Arizona.edu
