Improvements of irrigation and crop water management are always central to any discussions in the agricultural communities of the desert Southwest regarding higher crop production efficiencies.  That is particularly true in these days of water shortages.
In any crop production setting the crop (plant)-soil-water relationships are essential to producing a healthy and productive crop.  In desert agriculture, water is our first limiting agronomic (crop and soil) factor and there is no substitute for that.
Amid all the discussions about improvements in irrigation efficiency, the focus on plant-soil-water relations needs to be continually emphasized.  The objective of any irrigation system is to provide adequate irrigation water to the soil for the benefit of the crop.  Thus, it is important to understand the soil conditions and the actual crop-water needs for each irrigation event.

Every combination of a soil and a specific crop is unique, and that delicate relationship is compounded by the above ground environment the plant is growing in, the meteorological conditions.  The dynamics of crop-water demand change with each plant species and it will vary daily within a given crop in response to soil conditions, stage of growth, and meteorological conditions, i.e., temperature, humidity, wind speed, solar radiation, etc.   These meteorological factors must be appropriately considered for efficient irrigation management, irrespective of any type of irrigation system, i.e., flood, sprinkler, drip, etc.
In Arizona we are fortunate to have the Arizona Meteorological Network (AZMET) in place and fully operational with high quality data being collected from agricultural areas across the state on an hourly basis.  At present, this data is summarized daily from 25 agricultural sites and seven urban sites across the state.  https://ag.arizona.edu/azmet/

Dr. Paul Brown, Extension Specialist in Biometeorology (retired) began the development of the AZMET system in 1985 and the full operation of the system began in January 1986.  Prior to his retirement a few years ago, Dr. Brown managed and directed the AZMET system along with a robust research and Extension education program to provide numerous crop production tools that this system supports.  Together, Paul Brown and Bruce Russell developed an excellent weather system that is available to us all.   Dr. Jeremy Weiss now directs the AZMET program.

The meteorological data collected by AZMET include temperature (air and soil), humidity, solar radiation, wind (speed and direction), and precipitation.  AZMET also provides a variety of computed variables, including heat units (degree-days), chill hours, dew point, and reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo).  AZMET data are summarized in a variety of formats, including several ready-to-use summaries and comma-delimited (raw) ASCII text files that can be imported into most database and spreadsheet programs (Russell, 2011).
I have participated in numerous discussions recently regarding efforts to manage water resources in a broad sense, such as within an area or district, as well as in individual crop fields where the use of satellite-based evaporation (ET) estimates are being considered for application.  In Arizona, that should not be necessary since we have AZMET stations on the ground that are well-placed in agricultural areas with high quality data available daily.  The AZMET system provides direct measurements of daily atmospheric conditions that our crops are dealing with in each of the 25 locations.

With AZMET and the information directly available and accessible, in my view we should be using this system for our weather-based needs for crop management and not a remote satellite system.  Even if someone insists on using satellite-based systems, it will need ground truthing and AZMET data would be essential for that.
We should be using the AZMET data and related crop management tools.  This system has been developed by the University of Arizona Cooperative Extension System and it is openly available for direct access and use.

References:
Russell, B. 2011.  AZMET.  The Arizona Meteorological Network : A Brief Overview.  University of Arizona Cooperative Extension.  https://ag.arizona.edu/azmet/azmet04.htm

Hi, I’m Chris, and I’m thrilled to be stepping into the role of extension associate for plant pathology through The University of Arizona Cooperative Extension in Yuma County. I recently earned my Ph.D. in plant pathology from Purdue University in Indiana where my research focused on soybean seedling disease caused by Fusarium and Pythium. There, I discovered and characterized some of the first genetic resources available for improving innate host resistance and genetic control to two major pathogens causing this disease in soybean across the Midwest.

I was originally born and raised in Phoenix, so coming back to Arizona and getting the chance to apply my education while helping the community I was shaped by is a dream come true. I have a passion for plant disease research, especially when it comes to exploring how plant-pathogen interactions and genetics can be used to develop practical, empirically based disease control strategies. Let’s face it, fungicide resistance continues to emerge, yesterday’s resistant varieties grow more vulnerable every season, and the battle against plant pathogens in our fields is ongoing. But I firmly believe that when the enemy evolves, so can we.

To that end I am proud to be establishing my research program in Yuma where I will remain dedicated to improving the agricultural community’s disease management options and tackling crop health challenges. I am based out of the Yuma Agricultural Center and will continue to run the plant health diagnostic clinic located there. 

Please drop off or send disease samples for diagnosis to:
Yuma Plant Health Clinic
6425 W 8th Street
Yuma, AZ 85364

If you are shipping samples, please remember to include the USDA APHIS permit for moving plant samples.

You can contact me at:
Email: cdetranaltes@arizona.edu
Cell: 602-689-7328
Office: 928-782-5879

Thank you all very much. I look forward to meeting you all soon.

At the 2023 FIRA USA Robotics and Autonomous Farming Solutions Forum last month, some of the latest automated and robotic technologies were demonstrated in the field. Several of the weeding technologies demonstrated are brand new to the U.S. and/or Yuma, AZ area. These included a 5.6 inch² (2.4 x 2.4 inch) resolution fixed boomed spot sprayer (Fig. 1), a high precision, “turret gun” spot sprayer  (Fig. 2) and a mechanical weeder that utilizes a unique rotating blade design and lidar for depth control (Fig. 3). Although the test runs were short, I was impressed with the performance and possibilities of these machines. Company representatives said that they would be traveling to Arizona for the season and would like to meet with growers interested in their technology. Company contact information can be found at their respective websites, or feel free to contact me if you would like additional information.

Fig. 1. Ecorobotix¹ (Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland) precision weeding machine
demonstration at 2023 FIRA USA. The unit has modular, 6.6’ wide spray booms
equipped with 156 individually controllable spray nozzles to spot spray weeds
(top right). A vision system is used to detect weeds and spot spray resolution is
2.4 x 2.4 inches. Darker soil indicates where spray (water) was delivered to
targeted weeds (bottom).



Fig. 3. GreenTech Robotics’ Weed Spider¹ (Kelvin Grove, New Zealand)
demonstration at 2023 FIRA USA. The unit is equipped with a vision system for
detecting crop plants and weeds, and blades that move in and out of the crop row
to remove in-row weeds. Lidar sensors are used to create a 3-D image of the soil
surface and control cultivating blade depth.

---

[1] Reference to a product or company is for specific information only and does not endorse or recommend that product or company to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.

When I think about Lipid Biosynthesis Inhibitor herbicides, Post (sethoxidim) and Select (clethodim) come to my mind. A great description of these type of herbicides can be found at the Section VI of the Arizona Pest Control Advisor (PCA) Study Guide. They say a good teacher can explain complicated things in a simple way. Please read this explanation by Barry Tickes:

“These herbicides are known as ACCase inhibitors because they inhibit the production of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) which is an enzyme needed in the first steps of lipid or fatty acid production. Lipids are needed in the production of new membranes which, among other things, are needed in the production of cell walls. These chemicals move from the foliage to the growing points, only kill grasses, and have very little soil activity. Grasses stop growing immediately and slowly turn chlorotic or red and die usually in 7 to 21 days. These products are used to selectively kill grasses in broadleaf crops".
 

Classification	Common Name (s)	Commercial names	Arizona crop registrations
Aryloxphenoxy Propionates	fluazifop fenoxaprop clodinafop diclofop	Fusilade Puma, Acclaim, Option, Whip Discover Hoelon	Small grains, Cotton, trees & vines, Several broadleaf crops
Cyclohexanediones	sethoxydim clethodim tralkoxydim	Poast, Segment, Vantage, others Select, Arrow, Prism, Envoy, Intensity, Volunteer, Trigger, Section, others Achieve	Alfalfa, cotton, Several broadleaf Crops Small grains

 
You need to see this .. time lapse photography shows the symptoms of Poast herbicide to wheat.

This time of year, John would often highlight Lepidopteran pests in the field and remind us of the importance of rotating insecticide modes of action. With worm pressure present in local crops, it’s a good time to revisit resistance management practices and ensure we’re protecting the effectiveness of these tools for seasons to come. For detailed guidelines, see Insecticide Resistance Management for Beet Armyworm, Cabbage Looper, and Diamondback Moth in Desert Produce Crops .

VegIPM Update Vol. 16, Num. 20

Oct. 1, 2025

Results of pheromone and sticky trap catches below!!

Corn earworm:  CEW moth counts declined across all traps from last collection; average for this time of year.

Beet armyworm: BAW moth increased over the last two weeks; below average for this early produce season.

Cabbage looper: Cabbage looper counts increased in the last two collections; below average for mid-late September.

Diamondback moth: a few DBM moths were caught in the traps; consistent with previous years.

Whitefly:  Adult movement decreased in most locations over the last two weeks, about average for this time of year.

Thrips: Thrips adult activity increased over the last two collections, typical for late September.

Aphids: Aphid movement absent so far; anticipate activity to pick up when winds begin blowing from N-NW.

Leafminers: Adult activity increased over the last two weeks, about average for this time of year.