I hope you are frolicking in the fields of wildflowers picking the prettiest bugs.
I was scheduled to interview for plant pathologist position at Yuma on October 18, 2019. Few weeks before that date, I emailed Dr. Palumbo asking about the agriculture system in Yuma and what will be expected of me. He sent me every information that one can think of, which at the time I thought oh how nice!
When I started the position here and saw how much he does and how much busy he stays, I was eternally grateful of the time he took to provide me all the information, especially to someone he did not know at all.
Fast forward to first month at my job someone told me that the community wants me to be the Palumbo of Plant Pathology and I remember thinking what a big thing to ask..
He was my next-door mentor, and I would stop by with questions all the time especially after passing of my predecessor Dr. Matheron. Dr. Palumbo was always there to answer any question, gave me that little boost I needed, a little courage to write that email I needed to write, a rigid answer to stand my ground if needed. And not to mention the plant diagnosis. When the submitted samples did not look like a pathogen, taking samples to his office where he would look for insects with his little handheld lenses was one of my favorite times.
I also got to work with him in couple of projects, and he would tell me “call me John”. Uhh no, that was never going to happen.. until my last interaction with him, I would fluster when I talked to him, I would get nervous to have one of my idols listening to ME? Most times, I would forget what I was going to ask but at the same time be incredibly flabbergasted by the fact that I get to work next to this legend of a man, and get his opinions about pest management. Though I really did not like giving talks after him, as honestly, I would have nothing to offer after he has talked. Every time he waved at me in a meeting, I would blush and keep smiling for minutes, and I always knew I will forever be a fangirl..
Until we meet again.
It’s October and planting season is well underway. When planting lettuce, uniform seed spacing is critical for efficient, economical crop thinning. Due to their lack of precision, automated lettuce thinning machines cannot eliminate lettuce plants that are spaced closer than about 1 1/8” apart. These closely spaced plants, commonly referred to as “doubles”, must be carefully removed by hand which is time consuming and expensive.
Several years ago, we conducted trials examining the influence of planter travel speed on seed spacing uniformity (Siemens and Gayler, 2016). In the study, two types of planters - a vacuum planter (Stanhay 785 Singulaire) and a belt planter (Stanhay 870) were tested with pelleted lettuce seed at travel speeds of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mph at the Yuma Agricultural Center. Vacuum planter test results showed that the percentage of “difficult to thin” spacings, defined seeds spaced less than 1.1” apart, increased from about 5% to 10% as speed increased from 1.0 mph to 2.5 mph (Fig. 1). Concomitantly, the percentage of seeds “precisely placed” within 0.5” of the target location (i.e., 2.0 ± 0.5”) decreased from 70% to less than 45%, and the percentage of skips increased from 7% to 30%. Variability of seed spacing uniformity as measured by the coefficient of variation (COV) of seed spacings also increased.
Similar declines in planter performance were found with the belt planter (Fig. 2). As travel speed increased from 1.0 to 2.5 mph, the percentage of difficult to thin spacings increased from 2% to 10%, precise spacings decreased from 93% to 65% and skips increased from 2% to 8%.
For both planter types, there was a significant decline in performance as speed increased from 1.5 mph to 2.0 mph, a difference in speed of only 0.5 mph. These results suggest that it is prudent to check planter performance at the chosen operating speed prior to establishing an entire block to ensure that seed spacing uniformity, not just the number of seeds per foot, is acceptable.
In short, the study showed that planter travel speed had a significant effect on seed spacing uniformity and difficult to thin, close spacings - the higher the speed, the poorer the performance.
You may be asking what is the reason for the phenomenon observed? A logical explanation is that seeds are traveling at the speed of the planter when they are released and tend to “bounce and roll” in the direction of travel when they hit the soil surface. Thus, the higher the travel speed, the further seeds bounce and roll resulting in increased seed spacing variability.
References
Siemens, M.C., & Gayler, R.R. (2016). Improving seed spacing uniformity of precision vegetable planters. Appl. Eng. Agric., 32(5), 579-587
Fig. 1. Seeding performance of a vacuum vegetable planter sowing lettuce when
operated at four travel speeds.
Fig. 2. Seeding performance of a belt vegetable planter sowing lettuce when operated at
four travel speeds
It is reported that the herbicidal activities of Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs) were discovered in the 1940’s. Then, investigators in England and in the United States started their research on this type of herbicides1.
Some of these substances are hormones produced naturally by the plants and other are synthetically produced. Examples of naturally occurring growth regulators are gibberellins, auxin, cytokinin. Some stimulate stem elongation and cell elongation. One of the first synthetic selective herbicides developed is 2, 4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxiacetic acid).
PGRs are used extensively for broadleaf weed control in grass crops in this region such as grain production, bermudagrass, alfalfa, cole crops, sugarbeet, forages, and turf grasses. These herbicides upset the natural balance of the hormones that controls cell division, cell enlargement, protein synthesis, and respiration. That is why this group of herbicides is sometimes called the “hormone herbicides”2. In our area growers are very careful using these products due to volatility with our summer temperatures and the problems caused to sensitive crops.
According to a report from Texas A&M “phenoxy growth regulator herbicides are reported to have the least plant activity and soil residual activity; the carboxylic acids generally have the most. Broadleaf crops and turf grasses should not be planted into soils recently treated with these herbicides because they severely inhibit seedling emergence”2.
Some PGRs:
|
Family |
Common Name |
Trade Name |
|
phenoxy |
2,4-D |
Pasture pro, others |
|
2,4-DB |
Butyrac |
|
|
MCPA |
Rhonox |
|
|
MCPP |
Several names |
|
|
benzoic acid |
dicamba |
Banvel |
|
carboxylic acid |
Picloram |
Tordon 22K |
|
Clopyralid |
Stinger |
|
|
triclopyr |
Remedy |
|
|
quinclorac |
Facet |
