Soil is a natural component of terrestrial ecosystems, both native and agricultural. Soils are the foundation of plant and crop production systems (Brady and Weil, 2008; Parikh and James, 2012).
In terms of soil health, a good way to consider a soil system is from the standpoint of three main categories (physics, chemistry, and biology) that are fundamentally important with healthy soil function (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Soil health factors and chemical properties.
It is estimated that soil contains at least a quarter of the biological diversity (aka biodiversity) on our planet. Soils are second only to the oceans in terms of biological diversity. Billions of earthworms, nematodes, insects, fungi, bacteria, actinomycetes, viruses, and other invertebrates exist in soil naturally. These creatures produce and consume the organic material (i.e., crop residues) found in soil as part of their basic fund and collectively work to break down the organic materials that come from their bodies and plant materials into minerals and nutrients that are cycled in the soil system and support healthy conditions in the soil environment, including plant nutrients.
During the 20th century, soil scientists began to better understand the complexity of soil biology and ecology. From that work, many drugs and vaccines have been derived soil organisms. For example, antibiotics such as penicillin have been developed. Treatments for cancer such as bleomycin have come from soil and fungal infection treatments like amphotericin have also been derived from the soil microbiome. Accordingly, the biodiversity of soil still has a huge potential to provide new drugs that can help us in combating other illnesses and dealing with pathogenic and resistant microorganisms.
This tremendous biological diversity creates the foundation for the entire soil ecosystem. Soil ecosystems impact the growth of plants and animals in natural and agricultural systems. The biological composition of soils has a very strong influence on soil health.
During the 20th century soil scientists had an appreciation for the rich biological diversity in soil but they were limited in their analytical capacities (Waksman, 1936). In the past 40-50 years, soil scientists have employed an increasing level of new analytical tools that have allowed the discovery and better understanding of the number and diversity that naturally exists in soil (Sutton and Sposito, 2005).
A good description of biological diversity and its tremendous complexity can be demonstrated by consideration of the common composition of soil and the abundance of a few classes of microorganisms in one gram of soil (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Natural abundance of bacterial, actinomycetes, and fungal organisms in one
gram of soil.
It is incredible to realize that in one gram of soil there commonly exists nearly one billion individual bacterial organisms, more than a million actinomycetes organisms, and one million fungal organisms. All these organisms naturally exist in soil and these population numbers represent just one gram of soil!
Among the approximately one billion individuals in one gram of soil, there are commonly more than 10,000 different species. Soil biologists are now working to better identify individual organisms and understand their functions individually and how they function in the complexity of the soil ecosystem. We do not know all the species. Accordingly, we do not know how all these organisms are forming and functioning as a complex ecosystem. Soil ecology is a huge and rapidly expanding area of study.
We do know that soil biology and ecology are very important aspects of soil health (Figure 1). We also know that our management in the field, agronomic stewardship, has a strong influence on soil health and accordingly crop health.
Gaining a better understanding of soil health requires a better understanding of soil biodiversity and the functioning of soil ecosystems. It would be misleading to say that we have a solid understanding of the soil ecosystem function and all the managerial relationships. However, it is important to understand that working on this frontier of soil science and agriculture is critical to our efforts to maintain sustainable and productive agricultural systems for the future.
Figure 3. Interrelationship of agronomic stewardship, soil health, and crop health.
Wanted to share the following weed germination calendars now that the season has begun. Some summer weeds withstand part of the winter and some winter annuals the summer, so these charts are general guidelines. We hope this helps for making management decisions in your operation.
We have conducted a field efficacy trial evaluating the efficacy of 14 biological insecticides alone or as a tank mix against lepidopteran pests, including diamondback moth (DBM), beet armyworm(BAW), and cabbage looper (CL). The insect pressures were relatively low when we initiated the insecticide applications; the CL number was never high enough to be considered for statistical analysis and treatment comparisons.
We applied all insecticides at the highest label rate when sprayed alone or at mid-rate when sprayed as a mixture of two insecticides using an application volume of 40 gal/ac. The adjuvant, Oroboost, was added to each of the insecticide treatments at a rate of 0.4% v/v. Most of the insecticides evaluated in our trial are registered for lepidopteran control except for M-Pede, BotaniGard, and PFR-97.
The results of our trial showed that Xentari, Xentari + Pyganic, and Entrust provided the highest level of BAW suppression. We also found that other insecticides/mixes, including Aza-Direct, Dipel, Dipel +Pyganic, Gargoil, Grandevo, Venerate, M-Pede, and PFR-97, may also cause some levels of BAW suppression (Figure 1A). Xentari and Dipel + Pyganic provided the best DBM suppression, followed by Xentari + Pyganic, Dipel, and Entrust, which provided 50-60% of DBM suppression (Figure 1B). Pyganic alone did not control either BAW or DBM (Figure 1A&B).
Table 1. List of bioinsecticides evaluated
Figure 1. Means Beet armyworm larvae (A) and Diamondback moth (B) per cabbage plant as affected by bioinsecticide sprays.
In regions like Yuma, AZ, extensive farming practices, irrigation and nitrogen (N) fertilizer management should be considered simultaneously due to the important fact that N moves in the soil with water and both variables should be managed together to enhance production efficiency. Coupled irrigation and N management strategies with the efficient irrigation method can lead to a critical approach to increase irrigation and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) while maintaining crop yield and soil productivity and minimizing the potential for N leaching or losing. The mass of leached N during the growing season may be reduced by improved irrigation efficiency that can reduce drainage volume. For example, the surface/furrow irrigation system has greater irrigation depths and lower NUE than sprinkler irrigation systems. Moreover, the methodology of N application through split/timing applications can increase the NUE, especially when utilizing micro-irrigation and sprinkler irrigation systems. One of the primary objectives of the irrigation systems is to maximize the water storage in the root zone through uniform irrigation application and distribution and in the meantime to minimize water losses through deep percolation and surface run-off. In addition, irrigation systems have been utilized to apply fertilizers (fertigation) throughout the season. Generally, these systems provide a way to supply adequate N (allows small dosage application) to the crop in-season and those systems can deliver the desired nutrition amount to the crop at any crop stage with a high efficiency and distribution uniformity. In other words, a given irrigation system has the potential to reduce the fertilizer inputs and the production costs, reduce foliar disease, and minimize leaf wetness as well as reduce the weeds.
The three most commonly used irrigation methods/systems are (i) surface (gravity), (ii) sprinkler (including center pivot), and (iii) micro-irrigation. For each of the methods, there a different management processes and the uniformity of water applications as well as infiltration dynamics, which influence the efficiency of the system as well as the efficiency of N applications. Worldwide, low NUE is one of the most important challenges for researchers, farmers, and agencies, and it is on average quite low in both organic and conventional agricultural systems, including in developed nations. It is reported that globally, pre-plant N is most commonly applied, which may lead to poor synchrony between N and crop demand, contributing to low NUE. Applying N at a uniform rate is another factor of low NUE, because the available N level for crop uptake may vary between the fields and within a given field due to the spatial variability in soil characteristics and temporal characteristics due to environmental factors.
Timing nitrogen applications for lettuce is key to maximizing nutrient management efficiency, though it can be challenging if growers are constrained by time. To minimize nutrient loss, it's best to avoid pre-plant nitrogen applications, especially in the fall. At planting, apply a starter fertilizer, positioning it below and to the side of the seed row. The first sidedress application should occur after thinning at the 2-4 leaf stage, but only if soil nitrate-nitrogen is below the critical level. A second application is recommended a few weeks later at the cupping stage, contingent on soil nitrate levels. These applications should be carefully timed and adapted based on soil conditions to ensure effectiveness. Aligning nitrogen applications with the crop’s demand not only enhances nitrogen use efficiency but also helps in managing tight schedules, reduces environmental impacts, and optimizes lettuce yield and quality (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Harvesting in the Organic/Conventional Lettuce Production Field at the Valley
Research Center, University of Arizona Yuma Agricultural Center, Yuma, Arizona.
