Summer is finally over. Brassica transplants are in the ground, and direct-seeded broccoli and lettuce plantings are now beginning.  In the past week, I’ve observed or received reports from PCAs of key insect pests beginning to show up (or not) on melon and early produce crops in the desert.   
 
Seedling pests:  Flea beetles (FB) are beginning to show up in transplanted crops like they always do, but pressure has been light so far. We haven’t seen much in our experimental plots at YAC either.  Remember, FB adults lay eggs in the soil of their favored local host plants (i.e., alfalfa, cotton, purslane, pigweed and nightshade) where larvae feed on the roots to later emerge as adults. So, keep in mind, the source of that FB infestations hitting your new stands may not just be freshly cut hay, defoliated cotton, or disked weeds. In some areas, crickets seem to be abundant. Crickets like moisture and are often found under sprinkler pipes but can also be found in cracks in soils around fields or in drainage areas. 
 
Bagrada bug:    No reports of bagrada bug adults in transplanted brassica fields yet. Fall populations have been very light over the past several years, but don’t fall asleep on these guys.  It’s still early and they might surprise you as the season progresses.   Look for those fresh feeding signs on cotyledons and young leaves.  Experience suggests that they are most abundant after the monsoon humidity breaks.
 
Lepidopterous Larvae (worms):   Worm pressure seems to be below normal. Trap catches so far show that Cabbage looper moths are almost non-existent, and no reports on melons to date. They should pick-up as we approach October. A few reports of Beet armyworm larvae on the earliest transplants, and areawide pheromone traps suggest that moth activity is about normal (highest in Tacna/Roll). But they will show up sooner or later, so get ready.  You have numerous insecticide alternatives at your disposal to control them.  Have had a couple of reports of Diamondback moth larvae on newly transplanted brassica crops. However, we’ve yet to capture moths on pheromone traps which suggests that adult immigration on high altitude winds associated with recent storms has not occurred yet. Remember, DBM disappear each summer and reestablish on desert crops via transplants or migrate in on monsoon/tropical storms. I strongly stress that you check your Cole crops closely this fall, particularly following storms or on plants originating from coastal CA. 
 
Whiteflies:       Area wide sticky trap captures have been above average for the past 2 weeks and whiteflies can migrate long distances on high winds.  Reports in area melons range from light to moderate numbers so far, but there is still a lot of cotton out there yet to be picked. However adult numbers decreased dramatically on our experimental melons at the Ag Center over the weekend following the heavy rains we experienced (0.75”).  Remember, you have several insecticide alternatives to control them in melons and produce.  
 
For more information on IPM approaches for these pests visit:

• Insect Pests at Stand Establishment, 2023
• Bagrada Bug Management Tips for the Low Desert 2023
• Guidelines for Diamondback Moth Management in Desert Cole Crops, 2023
• Lepidopterous Larvae Control chart 2023
• Whitefly Control chart 2023

As part of the Southwest Ag Summit (SWAS) that took place in Yuma in late February, we conducted a breakout session on Thursday, 22 February 2024 titled “Colorado River Water Shortage: Agricultural Perspectives”.  
This session provided a brief review of the background, the current situation on the Colorado River, and very importantly it included an outlook on the current discussions among the basin states to negotiate a new compromise for the guidelines of use under conditions of water shortage.  These new guidelines will go into place at the end of 2026.  Both the upper and lower basin states have now submitted draft proposals to the Bureau of Reclamation (BoR) on 6 March 2024.
This breakout session at the Southwest Ag Summit provided up to date information and first-hand insight into the process.  The participants were each uniquely qualified to offer valuable perspectives on these issues.  
The participants included Elston Grubaugh, Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District, who introduced the discussion and served as program moderator.  Bart Fisher, Palo Verder Irrigation District and State of California Colorado River Water Board member, Fisher Ranch, Blythe CA, provided a California perspective with a background of extensive experience in Colorado River management over several decades.  Hank Auza, Yuma County Water User’s Association President and Yuma Ag Water Coalition representative, Barkley Co. of Arizona, Yuma AZ, provided an Arizona perspective.  
Elston has extensive experience working in irrigation districts on both the California and Arizona sides of the Colorado River.  He has a valuable perspective, and he plays an important role in the management of Colorado River water in the Yuma area.  We are fortunate to have Elston provide his direction for this program and offer his point of view.
Both Bart and Hank are directly involved in the ongoing reconsultation negotiations directed at developing the new Colorado River management guidelines that will go into place in 2026.  Both are part of their state's delegation in the current negotiations and represent the lower basin.  Bart and Hank are not only responsible for representing California and Arizona, but they are both active farmers in the Palo Verde Valley and Yuma area valleys, and they bring valuable perspectives to the discussions.
The goal of negotiations among the seven U.S. Colorado River basin states has been to submit a single document proposing guidelines to the BoR.  However, as was discussed at this program at the SWAS, the upper and lower basin state groups have been dealing with significant differences and were not able to come to a consensus agreement.  As a result, the upper and lower basin delegations each submitted separate proposals to the BoR in early March.
There is still a chance that both the upper and lower basin state groups can reach a common agreement for a unified proposal.  In the meantime, both proposals are under review by the BoR. Officials with the BoR have indicated that they will be working with the basin states in the next six months to develop a consensus draft proposal for post-2026 river management by the end of 2024.
Further details on the two proposals submitted on 6 March 2024 by the upper and lower basin groups and contrasting the two will be forthcoming in a future article.
For the excellent program that was provided at the 2024 SWAS, I want to thank Elston, Bart, and Hank for their outstanding presentations.  Each of the participants in this program brought a wealth of knowledge and experience to the discussion.  
Specifically for Bart and Hank, we are all indebted to them for their contributions and hard work while serving on the lower basin state delegations during these critical and challenging negotiations.  Their firsthand perspectives and contributions to this program are very much appreciated.

This study was conducted at the Yuma Valley Agricultural Center. The soil was a silty clay loam (7-56-37 sand-silt-clay, pH 7.2, O.M. 0.7%). Variety: Deluxe (HMX2595) was seeded, then sprinkler-irrigated to germinate seed on March 20, 2024on 84 inches between bed centers. All other water was supplied by furrow irrigation or rainfall. Treatments were replicated five times in a randomized complete block design. Each replicate plot consisted of 25 ft of bed. Treatment beds were separated by single nontreated beds. Treatments were applied with a tractor-mounted boom sprayer that delivered 50 gal/acre at 100 psi to flat-fan nozzles spaced 12 in apart. 

Spray treatments were done on 05-21-2024, 05-31-2024, 06-07-2024 and 06-14-24. Powdery mildew was first seen on 06-05-24. Please see excel file for additional details.  

Disease severity of powdery mildew (caused by Sphaerotheca fuliginea and S. fusca) severity was determined 6-17-2024 by rating 10 plants within each of the four replicate plots per treatment using the following rating system: 0 = no powdery mildew present; 1 = one to two mildew colonies on leaves  ;2 = powdery mildew present on one quarter of leaves; 3 = powdery mildew present on half of the leaves; 4 = powdery mildew present on more than half of leaf surface area ; 5 = powdery mildew present on entire leaf. These ratings were transformed to percentage of leaves infected values before being statistically analyzed.

The data in the table illustrate the degree of disease control obtained by application of the various treatments in this trial. Most treatments significantly reduced the final severity of powdery mildew compared to nontreated plants. Quintec, Merivon, Tesaris, Luna Sensation, and V6M-5-14 V gave the best disease control. Phytotoxicity symptoms were not noted for any treatments in this trial.

ANR Webinar 10/17 click link for details.

Our newly constructed self-propelled steam applicator is designed to inject steam into the soil and raise soil temperatures to levels sufficient to kill weed seed and soilborne pathogens (140°F for > 20 minutes). After the soil cools (< ½ day), the crop is planted into the disinfested soil. We have done some preliminary testing and are very encouraged. Results show that the machine is able to reach target temperatures at reasonable travel speeds, provide uniform temperature distribution across the bed and form nicely shaped beds suitable for subsequent planting. We still have some bugs to work out and identified improvements to make before shipping the unit to Salinas, CA where we will conduct field trials with crops this summer. If you are interested in seeing the machine operate or more information about soil steaming for soilborne pest control, please feel free to contact me.
Check out a video of the machine operating by clicking here or on the image below.

Fig. 1. Initial testing of self-propelled steam applicator video.

Acknowledgements
This project is sponsored and funded in part by the Propane Education and Research Council (PERC), Arizona Specialty Crop Block Grant Program and USDA-NIFA. We greatly appreciate their support.

We did some trials at the University of Arizona Yuma Agricultural Center in broccoli to evaluate and compare Napropamide (Devrinol) liquid formulation 2XT versus the Dry formulation DF-XT. 
This product inhibits the production of fatty acids in plants, which is crucial for plant development. It affects primarily the meristematic cells which are in growing points of the stems and roots. We saw activity especially on seedling development that we show in some pictures at the end of the article. 
Some growers expressed their concern on the safety of different levels of incorporation with sprinkler irrigation. Therefore, we established a test in which we applied the product as a broadcast application after planting. Then we used different levels of incorporation in some sections using 12, 24 and 36 hours of sprinkler irrigation. No difference was observed with the incorporation level in our trial. We observed temporary phytotoxicity from 4-10%. The data was obtained from visual evaluations. Also, a 0.5 to 1” height reduction was exhibited when compared to untreated plots. 
It is common that growers and PCAs make management decisions on herbicide applications in different crops knowing that some injury is expected. Such is the case for alfalfa, wheat, spinach, lettuce and in this case broccoli. Frequently slight stunting it is not noticed because commercial fields don’t have untreated areas for comparison.
We talked to PCA’s and growers at the SW Ag Summit and asked for their experience with napropamide this past season. Some noticed the broccoli exhibited similar levels of phyto, which they considered economically tolerable. 
We noticed that good soil prep was important for before the application of the product and avoiding direct contact of the seed with the product for best results.
On weed control we noticed good activity on nettleleaf goosefoot and lambsquarter. 
At the 45day we collected data counting SMALL and LARGE weeds and at the 60 day evaluation we noticed most of the SMALL goosefoot and lambsquarter in the high rate of napropamide plots stayed small (pic. below).

Beet armyworm: Moth counts remain very low consistent with seasonal temperatures, but below average for this point in the season.

Cabbage looper: Slight increase in activity, but moth counts remain unusually low for late January. 

Whitefly: Dult movement is at seasonal low consistent with temperatures and lack of melons or cotton.

Thrips: Activity remains lower than normal for this point late January. Increased movement noted in Roll/Tacna.

Aphids: Seasonal aphid counts peaked during the past 2 weeks, suggesting movement with recent winter storms and lack of desert vegetation. Counts were particularly high in North Yuma and Gila Valleys, and Bard.  Above average for this time of year.

Leafminers: Adult activity remains light in most trap locations. Trap counts  increasing slightly in the South Gila Valley.